To add on Wafa's point, users need to understand the product and its eco-system to enable them appreciate and provide feedback for improving the system in future. I agree with the proposal Wafa has made. Regards On Sep 21, 2016 1:37 AM, "Wafa Dahmani" <wafa@ati.tn> wrote: Hi Alan, I have just one comment for the point number 1.DNS and Content Regulation agree with you about the audiance but I think that the topic is relevant. We are used to say that content is not of the remits of ICANN but this issue was usually disscussed in the DNS forums I attended. it would be interesting to see how we can extend the ICANN perimiter. Best Le 20/09/2016 04:33, Alan Greenberg a écrit : See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan 1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false. 2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session. 3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each. 4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest. 5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs. 6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through. 7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us. 8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one. 9. Public Interest 3 Definitely 10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it. 11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes. 12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest. 13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs. 14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use. 15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea! From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se> <paf@netnod.se> <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net> <louie@louie.net> <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu> <tsinha@umd.edu> <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" <bverd@verisign.com> <bverd@verisign.com> <bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'> <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org> <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com> <sb@inapp.com> <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com" <cwilson@21cf.com> <cwilson@21cf.com> <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org> <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" <gbunton@tucows.com> <gbunton@tucows.com> <gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net> <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> <hcarrascob@gmail.com> <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org> <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000 A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs. Regards David --------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders: A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting. Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/ icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/. As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections: - Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values. Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots. Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September. Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing listALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...) _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)