There was an extensive and productive discussion regarding the possible endorsement of SSAC 101 or the SSAC letter to the GNSO (which included a subset of the issues raised in SAC 101 during the CPWG meeting that ended an hour or so ago. This included a presentation of the issues in 101 and identification of those that were included and those not in the letter. Once it it posted, those who we re not on the call may find it interesting to replay the Adobe Connect session from about the 1 hour mark until the end (which went WAY over time).\ The only explicit reservation raised to the items in both documents was a question of whether we should endorse the recommendation that there be no fees associated with RDDS access unless explicitly required by a PDP (in SSAC 101 but not the letter). The final result was with the exception of two people (one incoming ALAC Member and one At-Large participant) those on the call supported endorsement of SAC 101 (the other two favoured endorsing the subset of issues addressed in the letter). For the record, there were five ALAC Members on the call. Alan