To clarify 'I would have thought' translates to mean "I think y'all (ALAC) should be interested in these 2 pieces of Board's business? Not a reflection on the agenda items submitted for the Board/ALAC meeting, right? - Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>wrote:

Comment a bottom

...

From: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/agenda-23jun12-en.htm

23 June 2012

Consent Agenda ­ For Approval: ==============================

- Minutes of 14 March 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting Minutes of 14 March 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Minutes of 15 March 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Minutes of 16 March 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Minutes of 28 March 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Minutes of 10 April 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Minutes of 6 May 2012 ICANN Special Board Meeting - Delegation of 򋂊 (Oman) - SSAC Report on Dotless Domains - Ombudsman Regular Meetings with the Board - GNSO Improvements Program Wrap-Up/June 2012 - NomCom Transparency Guidelines - .post RSEP Request

Main Agenda ============

- Renewal of .com - FY13 Budget & Operating Plan - Location of April 2013 ICANN Public Meeting - WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report - Any Other Business

I would have thought that the .com agreement would have been of considerable interest to the committee. And the budget as well.

Alan

_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)