Good. Thanks. We may want to take it one step further and include part of your explanation in the text. I will give it a try tomorrow. Alan At 13/11/2013 09:38 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

Since these are modifications for clarity, I'll suggest one more. One bothered me and I now have a better idea how to express what it was.

"If the Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support were implemented, there is no assurance that they form a cohesive and consistent set of policies."

I recall this statement being questioned by members of the working group, for it is difficult to parse. What I believe it intended is that the selection of resolutions that achieved Consensus are not together reflective of a single approach to the issue, and in some cases the statements that apparently have Consensus even seem to contradict each other.

In light of this, I suggest this re-working of the line that is clearer and more direct to the point.

"The collection of Recommendations with Consensus level or Strong support, taken as a whole, do not form a cohesive and consistent set of policies"

Thanks,

- Evan