Topics for the ALAC-Board meeting
The topics that we supplied to them were: * CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the Board-ALAC meeting * Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 * Budget issues: * Multi-year GA and Summit planning * Annual "special" requests we should not have to make * New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions * Consumer Trust The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively. The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input. * Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? * What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability? Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet. We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues. Alan
Hi Alan Just a quick question on the new meeting strategy. Are there any suggestions that ALAC have because since my last presentation to the ALAC, I am yet to get feedback on any of the meetings. Perhaps it would be good to discuss any issues prior to meeting with board. Thanks Beran "The best of you are those who are best to the women" Mohammad SAW Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Mar 2016, at 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
The topics that we supplied to them were:
CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the Board-ALAC meeting Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Annual "special" requests we should not have to make New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions Consumer Trust
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively.
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input.
Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy. I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of annual « special » requests for the following reasons: the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience is Marrakech, and I don’t find meeting A too different from meetings of the « old » strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C). The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the special request one will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special » request, so it is not urgent. I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I propose:
feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability
Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Consumer Trust Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort?
What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit :
The topics that we supplied to them were:
CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the Board-ALAC meeting Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Annual "special" requests we should not have to make New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions Consumer Trust
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively.
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input.
Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hi, I agree it's quite heavy as well. I will suggest bringing new gtld before new meeting strategy and then we treat in that order. Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 2 Mar 2016 5:06 p.m., "Tijani BEN JEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com> wrote:
All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy. I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of annual « special » requests for the following reasons:
- the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience is Marrakech, and I don’t find meeting A too different from meetings of the « old » strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C). - The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the special request one will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special » request, so it is not urgent.
I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I propose:
- feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability
Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Consumer Trust Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort?
- What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit :
The topics that we supplied to them were:
- CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the Board-ALAC meeting - Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 - Budget issues: - Multi-year GA and Summit planning - Annual "special" requests we should not have to make - New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions - Consumer Trust
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively.
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input.
- Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? - What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Sorry for the mistake; my finger hit a wrong key, so apologize for the previous mail. Please disregard it. here is the good one: All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy. I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of annual « special » requests for the following reasons: the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience will be Marrakech, and I don’t find it (meeting A) too different from meetings of the « old » strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C). The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the special request point will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special » request, so it is not urgent. I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I propose: Feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability 10 min Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 10 min Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning 15 min Consumer Trust 10 min How are SO/ACs doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? 15 min ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> a écrit :
The topics that we supplied to them were:
CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of the Board-ALAC meeting Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Annual "special" requests we should not have to make New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions Consumer Trust
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively.
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input.
Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Given that the Board has raised a substantive issue, some change is in order. I agree that we should remove New Meeting Strategy. The budget item was there for a specific reason. We can further discuss on the weekend. -- Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos. On March 2, 2016 11:21:36 AM EST, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com> wrote:
Sorry for the mistake; my finger hit a wrong key, so apologize for the previous mail. Please disregard it. here is the good one:
All these points in 60 minutes??? I find it too heavy.
I suggest to remove the new meeting strategy point and the one of annual « special » requests for the following reasons: the new meeting strategy didn’t start yet: the first experience will be Marrakech, and I don’t find it (meeting A) too different from meetings of the « old » strategy. So, we will spend time assessing and reviewing when we will make a full cycle (Meetings A, B, and C). The importance of the multi-year planning for summits and GAs made me propose to remove the second sub-bullet point. I think that raising the special request point will dilute the subject and reduce the value of the first sub-bullet point. Also, we have a year before the next « special » request, so it is not urgent. I also suggest to define a time division for the remaining points. I propose: Feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability 10 min Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 10 min Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning 15 min Consumer Trust 10 min How are SO/ACs doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? 15 min ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tijani BEN JEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Phone: +216 98 330 114 +216 52 385 114 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Le 2 mars 2016 à 05:03, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>> a écrit :
The topics that we supplied to them were:
CCWG Accountability - if necessary based on status at the time of
the Board-ALAC meeting
Sensitive New gTLDs - GAC Category 1, Safeguards 1-8 Budget issues: Multi-year GA and Summit planning Annual "special" requests we should not have to make New Meeting Strategy - issues and suggestions Consumer Trust
The 2nd sub-bullet on budgets is a combination of the special request we made to bypass ICANN bureaucracy (not being able to use approved budget flexibly and having to beg to have adequate translation tools) and the issue of having to make a "special" request to train leaders and have them work effectively.
The Board has, for the first time in several years, raised issues for our input.
Diversity is considered to be a challenge in ICANN. How is your SO/AC doing with regard to enhancing diversity in all its dimensions? What can ICANN do to support that effort? What is your feedback on the final report of the CCWG on Accountability?
Clearly the 2nd one overlaps with our first bullet.
We will spend some time on the weekend discussing how we will address these issues.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (4)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Beran Dondeh -
Seun Ojedeji -
Tijani BEN JEMAA