Fwd: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan 1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false. 2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session. 3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each. 4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest. 5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs. 6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through. 7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us. 8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one. 9. Public Interest 3 Definitely 10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it. 11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes. 12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest. 13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs. 14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use. 15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" <bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com" <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" <gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, wed like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at <https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews>https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at <https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/>https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANNs mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
Dear Alan. I agree. Particularly in item 13. I also worried requesting opinion on things that are not fully defined, either in form or in content. Support them with this ignorance can generate non grata responsibilities. ICANN meetings have definite dates well in advance and allow think this is complete and defined. Kind regards Alberto De: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016 12:34 a.m. Para: ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: [ALAC] Fwd: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan 1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false. 2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session. 3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each. 4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest. 5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs. 6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through. 7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us. 8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one. 9. Public Interest 3 Definitely 10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it. 11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes. 12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest. 13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs. 14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use. 15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea! From: David Olive < <mailto:david.olive@icann.org> david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki < <mailto:katrina@nic.lv> katrina@nic.lv>, " <mailto:thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" < <mailto:thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, " <mailto:paf@netnod.se> paf@netnod.se" < <mailto:paf@netnod.se> paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" < <mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com> jbladel@godaddy.com>, " <mailto:louie@louie.net> louie@louie.net" < <mailto:louie@louie.net> louie@louie.net>, " <mailto:tsinha@umd.edu> tsinha@umd.edu" < <mailto:tsinha@umd.edu> tsinha@umd.edu>, " <mailto:bverd@verisign.com> bverd@verisign.com" < <mailto:bverd@verisign.com> bverd@verisign.com>, " <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" < <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, " <mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" < <mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, " <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> gregshatanipc@gmail.com" < <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, " <mailto:hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" < <mailto:hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond < <mailto:ocl@gih.com> ocl@gih.com>, " <mailto:tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" < <mailto:tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" < <mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz < <mailto:pdiaz@pir.org> pdiaz@pir.org>, " <mailto:sb@inapp.com> sb@inapp.com" < <mailto:sb@inapp.com> sb@inapp.com>, " <mailto:cwilson@21cf.com> cwilson@21cf.com" < <mailto:cwilson@21cf.com> cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll < <mailto:klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org> klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak < <mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com> rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, " <mailto:gbunton@tucows.com> gbunton@tucows.com" < <mailto:gbunton@tucows.com> gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" < <mailto:oscar@lacnic.net> oscar@lacnic.net>, " <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> hcarrascob@gmail.com" < <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso < <mailto:nick.tomasso@icann.org> nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" < <mailto:tanzanica.king@icann.org> tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000 A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs. Regards David --------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders: A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, wed like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting. Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/. As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections: - Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANNs mission and core values. Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots. Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September. Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   <mailto:king@icann.org> king@icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> www.icann.org --- El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Dear Alan, all See below in blue/ italic, my points Thank you and kind regards to all. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. De: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Alan Greenberg Enviado el: martes, 20 de septiembre de 2016 12:34 a.m. Para: ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Asunto: [ALAC] Fwd: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan 1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false. Agree, no need 2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session. I do not see aditional velue on what we have now. Could be aprt of the several gTLD meeting during the week 3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each. Coordinate effort may help to have more effective outcome. 4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest. I am quite involved even teaching at the MBA in Sao Paulo University here but agree not for ICANN’s priority right now, at least. 5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs. Agree, focus on end users regarding new gTLDs is under ALAC’s core. 6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through. We normally have Internet Governance session in ICANN meetings specially when close to IGF meetings to try to coordinate our participation. With IGF 6-9 December in Mexico I beleive will be relevant to have such coordination session. 7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us. Agree, abuse in gTLDs is a matter of concerning of end users, again our core business. 8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one. This focus is technical stuff to encourage ISPs, for instance, to use KPIs. Not our priority 9. Public Interest 3 Definitely - Agree 10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it. If it is not wider we should push to be. It is important inside and outside GNSO 11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes. There are several complains about tranparency on legal issues but I can ask, it is possible to have same transparency as we expect on budget , for instance? I doubt , it can cause more damage than benefice to our community as a whole. I could attend to ask for precaution on transparency regarding legal issues not to advocate more transparency. 12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest. I am in favor of this one - having studying new gTLds in the region and possible next round, there are many many issues that need more attention. New gTLds are enlarging the gap for uderserved regions comparing to well served ones. My only point is avoid talking about lack of telecom and energy as some love to raise, since this is not under ICANN’s mission and just waste our time. 13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs. As I said above – item 12 - , there are lots of problems regarding new gTLds in our regions and, as by my study, a real lack of awareness about the problems when consumers join new gTLDs in some underserved regions. Anyway, Awareness shall be a point to take into consideration and the way each region will deal to develepo such effort can be substantially diverse. I support the idea of discuss awareness. 14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use. Agree 15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea! Yes! this conversation is running here and I beleive is quite important to clearly difine ICANN’s mission limits. This will save us a lot of time! This session should be mandatory and available to anyone to use , in order to raise awareness around the globe. From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch<mailto:thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch<mailto:thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>>, "paf@netnod.se<mailto:paf@netnod.se>" <paf@netnod.se<mailto:paf@netnod.se>>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>, "louie@louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>" <louie@louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>>, "tsinha@umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>" <tsinha@umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>>, "bverd@verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>" <bverd@verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr<mailto:hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr<mailto:hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com<mailto:ocl@gih.com>>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org<mailto:tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org<mailto:tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com<mailto:mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org<mailto:pdiaz@pir.org>>, "sb@inapp.com<mailto:sb@inapp.com>" <sb@inapp.com<mailto:sb@inapp.com>>, "cwilson@21cf.com<mailto:cwilson@21cf.com>" <cwilson@21cf.com<mailto:cwilson@21cf.com>>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org<mailto:klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>>, "gbunton@tucows.com<mailto:gbunton@tucows.com>" <gbunton@tucows.com<mailto:gbunton@tucows.com>>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net<mailto:oscar@lacnic.net>>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>" <hcarrascob@gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com>> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org<mailto:nick.tomasso@icann.org>>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org<mailto:tanzanica.king@icann.org>> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000 A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs. Regards David --------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders: A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting. Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/. As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections: - Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values. Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots. Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September. Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org<mailto:king@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/> ________________________________ [vast logo]<https://www.avast.com/antivirus> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. www.avast.com<https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
My comments interspersed
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
Agree
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
It could be very interesting - but agree- it would need more preparation
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
There are more interesting and important issues on the list
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
Agree - not within ICANNs remit even if interesting
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
Needs more work. Is this about PICS - only support if it is within the broader context of newGTLDs
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
Maybe support - but again, is this ICANN’s remit.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
This is ICANN’s remit and yes, would be of inerest
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
Agree -
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
Yes, definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
Agree - this needs to go beyond GNSO. Why not SSAC, GAC etc as well as ALAC
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
The lawyer in me would find this of interest - but also am not sure of outcomes
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
This is clearly an issue for ALAC - one tha we have been talking about for some time
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
Agree - and agree with the caveat. This mud NOT be a session assuming new rounds of new gTLDs
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
Of cours his interests me and should interest everyone
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
I also like the idea Holly
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" <bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com" <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" <gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus. www.avast.com
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
My picks: 3 4 6 9 12 13 14 On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Judith Hellerstein <judith@jhellerstein.com
wrote:
Hi Alan,
I support 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, & 15 for my 7 sessions I would be interested in.
I also would be interested in 4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, but think others may not be. I agree with your assertions and comments on 10. The role of the Non-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within *ICANN*. It does not mention At Large at all and that is a problem.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness-- I agree with your view here as well. 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
I am involved in the planning for session 6 and it should be a good session
Cheers,
Judith
_________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
On 9/19/2016 11:33 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
* 3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC* 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
*5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection* 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
*6. Internet Governance - Public Session* 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
*9. Public Interest * 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within *ICANN*. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
*12. Underserved Regions in ICANN* 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
*13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet* 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
*15. What ICANN does not do and why!* 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv> <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch> <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se> <paf@netnod.se> <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com> <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net> <louie@louie.net> <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu> <tsinha@umd.edu> <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" <bverd@verisign.com> <bverd@verisign.com> <bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr> <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org> <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'> <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com> <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org> <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com> <sb@inapp.com> <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com" <cwilson@21cf.com> <cwilson@21cf.com> <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org> <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" <gbunton@tucows.com> <gbunton@tucows.com> <gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net> <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> <hcarrascob@gmail.com> <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org> <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/ icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing listALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
Your selections are largely okay, though I would select have selected 3,5,6,8,9,14,15 instead which is not so different from yours Cheers! Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 20 Sep 2016 4:34 a.m., "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" < bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, " hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com " <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" < gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/ icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
The criteria still leaves a lot of undefined areas but if I had to choose, my seven - and absent priority ranking - would be 5, 7, 9, 12, 13,14, & 15. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:33 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" < bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, " hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com " <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" < gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/ icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
Even though I am not currently in ALAC, I see the following as interesting with most participation: 6,7,9,12,13,14,15 -ed On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:34 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" < bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, " hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com " <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" < gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Hi Alan, I have just one comment for the point number 1.DNS and Content Regulation agree with you about the audiance but I think that the topic is relevant. We are used to say that content is not of the remits of ICANN but this issue was usually disscussed in the DNS forums I attended. it would be interesting to see how we can extend the ICANN perimiter. Best Le 20/09/2016 04:33, Alan Greenberg a écrit :
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" <bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, "hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com" <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" <gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews <https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews> and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/>
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
My selection would be: 4, 5 necessary, 6, 9 definitely, 13, 14, 15 very agreed with you kind regards On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
See the following message. An extension to Friday has been requested and I hope will be honoured. See my following very hastily prepared comments. Let me know how they match yours. Alan
1. DNS and Content Regulation 1 This session does not seem to allow for significant audience participation and I beleive some of the premises are false.
2. gTLD Marketplace Health index 2 Unclear if the session is on the marketplace or the index and I think more prep is needed prior to this being a high interest session.
3. How to do outreach within each SO/AC 3 Could be of interest if only to demonstrate the differences between groups and what outreach means to each.
4. ICANN Contribution to the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda 1 Although I personally would find this interesting, I am not sure it is really within the ICANN mandate nor would be of general interest.
5. ICANN Support for Multistakeholder Initiatives for Advancing Online Child Protection 3 Although the format is not detailed, this topic is very much in line with ALAC concerns about the lack of controls on new gTLDs.
6. Internet Governance - Public Session 3 I would support this. Fragmantation is an issue that will be of increasing interest, particularly if the IANA transition does not go through.
7. Mitigation of Abuse in gTLDs 3 Again, no indication of session format, but presuming an opportunity for audience participation I think that this would be of interest to us.
8. Operational session on KPIs, regarding ICANN's reach, spending, and engagement strategies ? I don't have a dgood feeling for this one.
9. Public Interest 3 Definitely
10. The role of the No-Commercial stakeholders within ICANN. A dialogue to foster understanding and co-operation within ICANN. 1 This description talks about non-commercial stakeholders within ICANN, but seems to focus purely within the GNSO. If indeed it was wider than that, I would support it.
11. Transparency on legal advice given to ICANN [to preserve its principles and openness 3 I would support this, although I am dubious on the outcomes.
12. Underserved Regions in ICANN 3 Again no info on session format, but the topic could be of interest.
13. Universal Consumer Awareness about the largest ever expansion of the Internet 3 I agreed tat the ALAC would partiicpate in this session, but explicitly said we would not likely support a Ry request for ICANN to embark on a program to support growth in use of new gTLDs.
14. Update on WHOIS-Related Initiatives 3 There is so much going on that such an update would be of use.
15. What ICANN does not do and why! 3 I like the idea!
From: David Olive <david.olive@icann.org> To: Katrina Sataki <katrina@nic.lv>, "thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch" <thomas.schneider@bakom.admin.ch>, "paf@netnod.se" <paf@netnod.se>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@godaddy.com>, "louie@louie.net" <louie@louie.net>, "tsinha@umd.edu" <tsinha@umd.edu>, "bverd@verisign.com" < bverd@verisign.com>, "alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, "tonyarholmes@btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes@btinternet.com>, "gregshatanipc@gmail.com" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>, " hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr" <hilaliaziz@yahoo.fr>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com>, "tapani.tarvainen@effi.org" <tapani.tarvainen@effi.org>, "'mcknight.glenn@gmail.com'" <mcknight.glenn@gmail.com>, Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>, "sb@inapp.com" <sb@inapp.com>, "cwilson@21cf.com " <cwilson@21cf.com>, Klaus Stoll <klaus.stoll@gkpfoundation.org>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, "gbunton@tucows.com" < gbunton@tucows.com>, "Oscar Robles" <oscar@lacnic.net>, "hcarrascob@gmail.com" <hcarrascob@gmail.com> CC: Nick Tomasso <nick.tomasso@icann.org>, "Tanzanica S. King" <tanzanica.king@icann.org> Subject: ICANN57 - High Interest Topics - Next Steps Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:34:58 +0000
A message from the Meetings team asking for your inputs.
Regards David
--------------------------------------------------------------- Dear SO-AC Leaders:
A total of 15 potential topics for high-interest session slots have been identified by your groups for ICANN57 in Hyderabad. With just seven slots available for these, we’d like to invite you to take one more step towards finalizing topics for the meeting.Â
Please see details for the potential topics at https://meetings.icann.org/en/hitreviews and a corresponding review form at https://icann.wufoo.com/forms/ icann57-hit-proposal-review-form/.
As noted on the form, please use the following high-interest session criteria to support your selections:
- Topic has potential to attract a large audience (200+) and be of interest across most, if not all SO/ACs. - Proposed format allows for adequate audience participation within a 75-90 minute session slot. - Topic has clear goals and objectives which are closely aligned with ICANN’s mission and core values.
Your responses will be used to identify seven (7) topics for the main meeting room high-interest session slots.
Please submit your reviews as soon as possible but no later than EOD 18 September.
Tanzanica S. King Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design ICANN
Office  +1 310 301 5800 Mobile +1 310 995 3038 Email   king@icann.org www.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
participants (11)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Alberto Soto -
Carlton Samuels -
Eduardo Diaz -
Harold Arcos -
Holly Raiche -
Judith Hellerstein -
Maureen Hilyard -
Seun Ojedeji -
Vanda Scartezini -
Wafa Dahmani