Process to ratify CCWG Proposal
On the assumption the the CCWG will come to closure on all issues and publish a revised final proposal, that ALAC needs a process by which we can decide whether to ratify it or not. We are starting to see "final" revised documents for the various recommendations. I propose the following: 1. As these documents are made available, I suggest that we distribute them to the ALAC and IANA-Issues lists, along with a (hopefully) concise summary of what has changed. I can do some of these summaries, but I am looking for volunteers who have a good understanding of other recommendations to volunteer to do those (please volunteer directly to me). 2. All comments will be welcome, but for each document, if there are any concerns THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT JUSTIFY ALAC REJECTION, these must be raised promptly for discussion. If there are statements that you feel the ALAC MUST make in relation to a recommendation, even though we will ratify, these should also be raised. 3. By the time we get to Marrakech, we should have already covered the majority of the proposal. 4. In Marrakech, we will allow sufficient time for the discussion of any final changes and if appropriate a formal vote on either the entire proposal, or on a recommendation-by recommendation basis. Comments please. Alan
Alan, the proposal looks consistent. I believe we all have read enough this documents to now know what is relevant and all interested persons have already commented. Resume, IMO, is not necessary anymore. Focus on what we can not left behind that is really relevant, alerting all others , looks the best decision. Kind regards, Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 2/3/16, 1:13 AM, "alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
On the assumption the the CCWG will come to closure on all issues and publish a revised final proposal, that ALAC needs a process by which we can decide whether to ratify it or not.
We are starting to see "final" revised documents for the various recommendations.
I propose the following:
1. As these documents are made available, I suggest that we distribute them to the ALAC and IANA-Issues lists, along with a (hopefully) concise summary of what has changed. I can do some of these summaries, but I am looking for volunteers who have a good understanding of other recommendations to volunteer to do those (please volunteer directly to me).
2. All comments will be welcome, but for each document, if there are any concerns THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT JUSTIFY ALAC REJECTION, these must be raised promptly for discussion. If there are statements that you feel the ALAC MUST make in relation to a recommendation, even though we will ratify, these should also be raised.
3. By the time we get to Marrakech, we should have already covered the majority of the proposal.
4. In Marrakech, we will allow sufficient time for the discussion of any final changes and if appropriate a formal vote on either the entire proposal, or on a recommendation-by recommendation basis.
Comments please.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Seems reasonable. TMD On 2/2/2016 10:13 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
On the assumption the the CCWG will come to closure on all issues and publish a revised final proposal, that ALAC needs a process by which we can decide whether to ratify it or not.
We are starting to see "final" revised documents for the various recommendations.
I propose the following:
1. As these documents are made available, I suggest that we distribute them to the ALAC and IANA-Issues lists, along with a (hopefully) concise summary of what has changed. I can do some of these summaries, but I am looking for volunteers who have a good understanding of other recommendations to volunteer to do those (please volunteer directly to me).
2. All comments will be welcome, but for each document, if there are any concerns THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT JUSTIFY ALAC REJECTION, these must be raised promptly for discussion. If there are statements that you feel the ALAC MUST make in relation to a recommendation, even though we will ratify, these should also be raised.
3. By the time we get to Marrakech, we should have already covered the majority of the proposal.
4. In Marrakech, we will allow sufficient time for the discussion of any final changes and if appropriate a formal vote on either the entire proposal, or on a recommendation-by recommendation basis.
Comments please.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Timothy Denton 613-789-5397 line 613 222 1850 cell
+1 Cheers! On 3 Feb 2016 8:51 p.m., "Timothy Denton" <tim@tmdenton.com> wrote:
Seems reasonable. TMD
On 2/2/2016 10:13 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
On the assumption the the CCWG will come to closure on all issues and publish a revised final proposal, that ALAC needs a process by which we can decide whether to ratify it or not.
We are starting to see "final" revised documents for the various recommendations.
I propose the following:
1. As these documents are made available, I suggest that we distribute them to the ALAC and IANA-Issues lists, along with a (hopefully) concise summary of what has changed. I can do some of these summaries, but I am looking for volunteers who have a good understanding of other recommendations to volunteer to do those (please volunteer directly to me).
2. All comments will be welcome, but for each document, if there are any concerns THAT YOU FEEL MIGHT JUSTIFY ALAC REJECTION, these must be raised promptly for discussion. If there are statements that you feel the ALAC MUST make in relation to a recommendation, even though we will ratify, these should also be raised.
3. By the time we get to Marrakech, we should have already covered the majority of the proposal.
4. In Marrakech, we will allow sufficient time for the discussion of any final changes and if appropriate a formal vote on either the entire proposal, or on a recommendation-by recommendation basis.
Comments please.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Timothy Denton 613-789-5397 line 613 222 1850 cell _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (4)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Seun Ojedeji -
Timothy Denton -
Vanda Scartezini