GAC and ccNSO comments on the ICANN Meeting Strategy
Hi Maureen and Marita I hope we are responding to this? If we are talking about the MSM, then the ability to participate meaningfully should be reflected in the schedule. I note particularly that, in spite of the document talking time zone rotation, the proposed schedule has the same tine zones for sessions. I also wonder at the amount of time for networking events and whether some of that time can be used for more policy sessions or cross community meetings? I largely support the GAC comments and hope we are responding (happy to draft something) Holly
On Dec 21, 2020, at 2:25 PM, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
<GAC Comments-ICANN Meetings 2020.pdf>
Hi Holly I am happy to submit any comments made by At-Large to the discussions taking in the ccNSO and GAC. M On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 5:30 PM <h.raiche@internode.on.net> wrote:
Hi Maureen and Marita
I hope we are responding to this? If we are talking about the MSM, then the ability to participate meaningfully should be reflected in the schedule.
I note particularly that, in spite of the document talking time zone rotation, the proposed schedule has the same tine zones for sessions. I also wonder at the amount of time for networking events and whether some of that time can be used for more policy sessions or cross community meetings?
I largely support the GAC comments and hope we are responding (happy to draft something)
Holly
On Dec 21, 2020, at 2:25 PM, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
<GAC Comments-ICANN Meetings 2020.pdf>
participants (2)
-
h.raiche＠internode.on.net -
Maureen Hilyard