First thanks to Alan for a very clear statement of rules and a very sensible suggestion. And thanks for the discussion. And I am also fine with the approach highlighted by Evan HOlly On Thu 02/10/14 11:56 PM , Evan Leibovitch evan@telly.org sent:

On 2 October 2014 09:37, Alan Greenberg <alan .greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:

...

ALS certification votes shall be conducted in such a way that there will> be no public disclosure of how ALAC Members voted. However, the details of> how ALAC Members voted will be available to ICANN At-Large staff and the> ALAC Chair to allow them to conduct private interviews with voters to be> able to put together a rationale for why any particular decision was made.> Comments ​?

I like this. Fine with me. ​

​- Evan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list

ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.orgALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+C ommittee+(ALAC)