Fwd: Re: Draft letter to House Energy & Commerce Committee
Dear all, there has recently been discussion on the NARALO list, regarding hearings taking place in the US, including a hearing by the Senate Committee on Science, Energy & Transportation (held Dec 8) and a hearing by the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee (held on Dec 14th -- i.e. today). Evan has kindly explained what these are and how they can accept comments, with clear links to the hearings. His message is included below. Please find enclosed, a draft of the first letter from Beau Brendler, NARALO Chair and co-signed by me, Chair of the ALAC, to be sent to the Senate Committee by closing of business day today. It will be sent via two paths, to the Chair of the Committee, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller. Since this draft letter is not a policy paper or ALAC Statement but rather a letter to tell the Senate "you wish to see end user input in ICANN, hey look, here we are", it does not require a formal vote, but it will be archived in our ALAC correspondence. We shall also submit a similar letter to Chair of the the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee, Congressman Fred Upton, should this be required. I understand that Kurt Pritz will be one of the witnesses providing testimony in the hearing, so we'll have to see what gets addressed at the hearing and if a completion of information is required, no doubt that Beau and I would be happy to oblige. Kind regards, Olivier On 13/12/2011 06:49, Evan Leibovitch wrote :
An important point of clarification (brought to me by Amber Sterling of the NPOC earlier today) about the deadlines.
There are two different hearings
1. Senate Committee on Science Energy and Transportation <http://1.usa.gov/vzddPH> (held Dec 8) After the verbal testimony was given, the public is able to send comments to the Committee by EoB Dec 14
2. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee <http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9134> (to be held Dec 14) After the verbal testimony is given, the public will be able to send comments (deadline will be announced at the meeting)
So... the letter Olivier has drafted is in response to the Senate hearing (chair: John Rockefeller) and needs to be sent there before Wednesday EoB. The letter mentions Esther Dyson, who participated in the Senate hearing last week but will *not* be at the House hearing this Wednesday.
We may choose to send another, similar letter to the House committee after its testimony is heard. But the one Olivier drafted (the content of which I agree with) needs to go to Mr. Rockefeller and the Senate committee.
Thanks OCL I wonder though as you have gone to the second page with the layout is it worthwhile inserting the ALAC and At-Large Structure diagram as a easy to read and understand graphic on the last (2nd ) page below the signature line as a form of 'appendix' You know pictures are worth a <insert ###> of words rule... Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO) On 15 December 2011 04:00, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear all,
there has recently been discussion on the NARALO list, regarding hearings taking place in the US, including a hearing by the Senate Committee on Science, Energy & Transportation (held Dec 8) and a hearing by the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee (held on Dec 14th -- i.e. today). Evan has kindly explained what these are and how they can accept comments, with clear links to the hearings. His message is included below.
Please find enclosed, a draft of the first letter from Beau Brendler, NARALO Chair and co-signed by me, Chair of the ALAC, to be sent to the Senate Committee by closing of business day today. It will be sent via two paths, to the Chair of the Committee, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller.
Since this draft letter is not a policy paper or ALAC Statement but rather a letter to tell the Senate "you wish to see end user input in ICANN, hey look, here we are", it does not require a formal vote, but it will be archived in our ALAC correspondence.
We shall also submit a similar letter to Chair of the the House of Representatives Energy & Commerce Committee, Congressman Fred Upton, should this be required. I understand that Kurt Pritz will be one of the witnesses providing testimony in the hearing, so we'll have to see what gets addressed at the hearing and if a completion of information is required, no doubt that Beau and I would be happy to oblige.
Kind regards,
Olivier
On 13/12/2011 06:49, Evan Leibovitch wrote :
An important point of clarification (brought to me by Amber Sterling of the NPOC earlier today) about the deadlines.
There are two different hearings
1. Senate Committee on Science Energy and Transportation <http://1.usa.gov/vzddPH> (held Dec 8) After the verbal testimony was given, the public is able to send comments to the Committee by EoB Dec 14
2. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee < http://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings/hearingdetail.aspx?NewsID=9134> (to be held Dec 14) After the verbal testimony is given, the public will be able to send comments (deadline will be announced at the meeting)
So... the letter Olivier has drafted is in response to the Senate hearing (chair: John Rockefeller) and needs to be sent there before Wednesday EoB. The letter mentions Esther Dyson, who participated in the Senate hearing last week but will *not* be at the House hearing this Wednesday.
We may choose to send another, similar letter to the House committee after its testimony is heard. But the one Olivier drafted (the content of which I agree with) needs to go to Mr. Rockefeller and the Senate committee.
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
On 14 December 2011 12:09, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks OCL I wonder though as you have gone to the second page with the layout is it worthwhile inserting the ALAC and At-Large Structure diagram as a easy to read and understand graphic on the last (2nd ) page below the signature line as a form of 'appendix' You know pictures are worth a <insert ###> of words rule...
I'm not sure that such an introductory letter needs much explanation, let alone diagrams. We're simply indicating "A forum to represent the public interest within ICANN currently exists, if you're genuinely interested in hearing that PoV". The mere awareness -- especially if we get on a mailing list to participate in future solicitations of comment -- is a major step. If a Congressperson wants to peek inside the sausage factory we can give offer as much (or as little) detail as necessary. Besides, this is the US Congress within an amosphere of political exceptionalism. Any interest in the geographical diversity of At-Large (IMO) would be accidental. - Evan
Hi Everyone First - well done on the letter- and congratulations to Olivier and Beau Next, on Evan's point, I tent to agree. Maybe just a link to the org structure so those who don't know where ALAC sits can find out. Well done Kind regards Holly Raiche h.raiche@internode.on.net On 15/12/2011, at 6:16 AM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
On 14 December 2011 12:09, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks OCL I wonder though as you have gone to the second page with the layout is it worthwhile inserting the ALAC and At-Large Structure diagram as a easy to read and understand graphic on the last (2nd ) page below the signature line as a form of 'appendix' You know pictures are worth a <insert ###> of words rule...
I'm not sure that such an introductory letter needs much explanation, let alone diagrams. We're simply indicating "A forum to represent the public interest within ICANN currently exists, if you're genuinely interested in hearing that PoV".
The mere awareness -- especially if we get on a mailing list to participate in future solicitations of comment -- is a major step. If a Congressperson wants to peek inside the sausage factory we can give offer as much (or as little) detail as necessary.
Besides, this is the US Congress within an amosphere of political exceptionalism. Any interest in the geographical diversity of At-Large (IMO) would be accidental.
- Evan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (4)
-
Cheryl Langdon-Orr -
Evan Leibovitch -
Holly Raiche -
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond