This questionnaire with its answers reiterates the ALAC's WHOIS positions expressed at multiple times and in many places in this one place. It gets my support. Add the URLs to previous ALAC WHOIS Statements and its good to go. -Carlton Chair, At-Large WHOIS WG ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>wrote:

ALAC input was requested by the ongoing GNSO PDP on mandating a Thick Whois for all registries. Although previous ALAC statements made it clear that we were strongly in support of Thick Whois, we had not specifically addressed all of the issues being discussed in the WG.

A draft reply can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/**kIVZAg<https://community.icann.org/x/kIVZAg> .

Comments welcome, but note that the target reply date was today. I have said that ALAC would be responding but that we would be late, but quick action would be appreciated.

A copy is also attached here for your convenience.

Alan _______________________________________________ WHOIS-WG mailing list WHOIS-WG@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg

WHOIS WG Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy