Community Priority Evaluations [Any Updates?]
Dear ALAC, Rinalia had updated us on November 20, 2013, re: CPE: *"The ALAC sent advice to the ICANN board requesting for preferential treatment of community applications that fulfill certain criteria precisely because we knew that an auction as a process for resolving string contention would disadvantage community applicants with less financial means than big industry players. We also urged the Board to ensure that the Economist Intelligence Unit has sufficient community expertise in its panel that is tasked to conduct the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) because community strings that pass the CPE would be in the position to knock out competing applications without going to action. Sadly, the Board response on these matters has been most disappointing."* Wonder what the developments and hope that the ALAC will continue pushing the global public interest in this regard. Sala
Dear Sala, the ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) discussed this. One of my Action Items was to contact the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and ask them about the Community component of their panels. I reported that to-date, I still have not received any reply or acknowledgement from the EIU. With the lack of information, Heidi has been tasked to find out with staff what is the progress of the CPE and will revert back to us, in time for the monthly ALAC call which this month will take place on 28 January 2014. Kind regards, Olivier On 17/01/2014 21:51, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
Dear ALAC,
Rinalia had updated us on November 20, 2013, re: CPE:
*"The ALAC sent advice to the ICANN board requesting for preferential treatment of community applications that fulfill certain criteria precisely because we knew that an auction as a process for resolving string contention would disadvantage community applicants with less financial means than big industry players. We also urged the Board to ensure that the Economist Intelligence Unit has sufficient community expertise in its panel that is tasked to conduct the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) because community strings that pass the CPE would be in the position to knock out competing applications without going to action. Sadly, the Board response on these matters has been most disappointing."*
Wonder what the developments and hope that the ALAC will continue pushing the global public interest in this regard.
Sala _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Dear Olivier, Many thanks. I will wait to hear Heidi's report and read the summary when it becomes available. Would it help of RALOs alongside the ALAC also publish statements to drive the message home? I am glad that it's on the ALAC Leadership Team's agenda. Best Wishes, Sala Sent from my iPad
On Jan 18, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Sala,
the ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) discussed this. One of my Action Items was to contact the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and ask them about the Community component of their panels. I reported that to-date, I still have not received any reply or acknowledgement from the EIU. With the lack of information, Heidi has been tasked to find out with staff what is the progress of the CPE and will revert back to us, in time for the monthly ALAC call which this month will take place on 28 January 2014. Kind regards,
Olivier
On 17/01/2014 21:51, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: Dear ALAC,
Rinalia had updated us on November 20, 2013, re: CPE:
*"The ALAC sent advice to the ICANN board requesting for preferential treatment of community applications that fulfill certain criteria precisely because we knew that an auction as a process for resolving string contention would disadvantage community applicants with less financial means than big industry players. We also urged the Board to ensure that the Economist Intelligence Unit has sufficient community expertise in its panel that is tasked to conduct the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) because community strings that pass the CPE would be in the position to knock out competing applications without going to action. Sadly, the Board response on these matters has been most disappointing."*
Wonder what the developments and hope that the ALAC will continue pushing the global public interest in this regard.
Sala _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Dear Sala, thanks for your follow-up. The general concern was that the ALAC asked for community involvement on those community evaluation panels. The Board rejected that idea in its response. The ship sailed without us. We tried to alert the Captain of the ship as it sailed. It will sailed without us. Kind regards, Olivier On 18/01/2014 11:46, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
Dear Olivier,
Many thanks. I will wait to hear Heidi's report and read the summary when it becomes available. Would it help of RALOs alongside the ALAC also publish statements to drive the message home?
I am glad that it's on the ALAC Leadership Team's agenda.
Best Wishes, Sala
Sent from my iPad
On Jan 18, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Sala,
the ALAC Leadership Team (ALT) discussed this. One of my Action Items was to contact the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) and ask them about the Community component of their panels. I reported that to-date, I still have not received any reply or acknowledgement from the EIU. With the lack of information, Heidi has been tasked to find out with staff what is the progress of the CPE and will revert back to us, in time for the monthly ALAC call which this month will take place on 28 January 2014. Kind regards,
Olivier
On 17/01/2014 21:51, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: Dear ALAC,
Rinalia had updated us on November 20, 2013, re: CPE:
*"The ALAC sent advice to the ICANN board requesting for preferential treatment of community applications that fulfill certain criteria precisely because we knew that an auction as a process for resolving string contention would disadvantage community applicants with less financial means than big industry players. We also urged the Board to ensure that the Economist Intelligence Unit has sufficient community expertise in its panel that is tasked to conduct the Community Priority Evaluation (CPE) because community strings that pass the CPE would be in the position to knock out competing applications without going to action. Sadly, the Board response on these matters has been most disappointing."*
Wonder what the developments and hope that the ALAC will continue pushing the global public interest in this regard.
Sala _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
participants (3)
-
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond -
Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro -
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro