Acceptance of Chair Nomination
Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support. It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN. I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do. I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas: * ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. * Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. * ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original "Interim ALAC" to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair's involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. * The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it "their" money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem. Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years. All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation. I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year. I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl. Alan
Alan has outlined the At-Large achievements succinctly and framed the challenges yet ahead with a certain clarity. Mark me a +1: chairing the ALAC has become more than a full time job. And by some measures, a thankless one. I confess I'm a policy wonk with a great personal interest in most of the issues we are called to address in the ALAC. But it still steams me when we are treated as unloved third cousins from the countryside, constantly under pressure to hold our place and entitlements.
From the instigation that was ALAC 2.0, Alan has worked tirelesdly to advancethe enduser sgenda. Since his first term as ALAC Chair, he has done yeoman work to hold the line on our common achievements and has worked doubly hard to advance the At-Large agenda. He should be reelected.
I urge the electors to vote and assert your confidence in Alan's leadership. -Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <876-818-1799>Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support.
It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN.
I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do.
I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas:
- *ALS Effectiveness:* We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. - *Policy Development:* We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. - *ALAC Chair Viability:* As the ALAC transitioned from the original “Interim ALAC” to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became *substantially* more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair’s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. - *The ALAC in ICANN: *When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it “their” money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem.
Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years.
All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation.
I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year.
I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
+1 Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia@internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 One World, One Internet cid:26A2D0D9-E7A9-455D-BCDC-26757E8E3078 ex - Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2014 – ex – ALAC Member 2009-2011 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> http://atlarge.icann.org Skype: sylvia_leite Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil De: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Carlton Samuels Enviada em: domingo, 28 de agosto de 2016 15:05 Para: Alan Greenberg; Stephanie Perrin Cc: ALAC Assunto: Re: [ALAC] Acceptance of Chair Nomination Alan has outlined the At-Large achievements succinctly and framed the challenges yet ahead with a certain clarity. Mark me a +1: chairing the ALAC has become more than a full time job. And by some measures, a thankless one. I confess I'm a policy wonk with a great personal interest in most of the issues we are called to address in the ALAC. But it still steams me when we are treated as unloved third cousins from the countryside, constantly under pressure to hold our place and entitlements.
From the instigation that was ALAC 2.0, Alan has worked tirelesdly to advancethe enduser sgenda. Since his first term as ALAC Chair, he has done yeoman work to hold the line on our common achievements and has worked doubly hard to advance the At-Large agenda. He should be reelected.
I urge the electors to vote and assert your confidence in Alan's leadership. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support. It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN. I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do. I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas: * ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. * Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. * ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original “Interim ALAC” to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair’s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. * The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it “their” money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem. Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years. All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation. I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year. I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Well said... I have not known him for so long, but my experience of him has been interesting, not because he always meet my expectations (I blame that on old man vis young man syndrome ;-) ) but because he grants listening ears and strive to give everyone due regard. Alan no doubt has the skills to continue leading such a diverse group like ALAC. I wish him all the best. Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos On 28 Aug 2016 7:05 p.m., "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:
Alan has outlined the At-Large achievements succinctly and framed the challenges yet ahead with a certain clarity. Mark me a +1: chairing the ALAC has become more than a full time job. And by some measures, a thankless one.
I confess I'm a policy wonk with a great personal interest in most of the issues we are called to address in the ALAC. But it still steams me when we are treated as unloved third cousins from the countryside, constantly under pressure to hold our place and entitlements.
From the instigation that was ALAC 2.0, Alan has worked tirelesdly to advancethe enduser sgenda. Since his first term as ALAC Chair, he has done yeoman work to hold the line on our common achievements and has worked doubly hard to advance the At-Large agenda. He should be reelected.
I urge the electors to vote and assert your confidence in Alan's leadership.
-Carlton
============================== *Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799 <876-818-1799>Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support.
It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN.
I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do.
I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas:
- *ALS Effectiveness:* We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. - *Policy Development:* We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. - *ALAC Chair Viability:* As the ALAC transitioned from the original “Interim ALAC” to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became *substantially* more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair’s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. - *The ALAC in ICANN: *When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it “their” money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem.
Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years.
All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation.
I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year.
I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/di splay/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+ Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
Dear Seun, Experienced rather than old I would say :P Saludos, León
El ago 28, 2016, a las 2:21 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> escribió:
Well said... I have not known him for so long, but my experience of him has been interesting, not because he always meet my expectations (I blame that on old man vis young man syndrome ;-) ) but because he grants listening ears and strive to give everyone due regard.
Alan no doubt has the skills to continue leading such a diverse group like ALAC. I wish him all the best.
Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 28 Aug 2016 7:05 p.m., "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote: Alan has outlined the At-Large achievements succinctly and framed the challenges yet ahead with a certain clarity. Mark me a +1: chairing the ALAC has become more than a full time job. And by some measures, a thankless one.
I confess I'm a policy wonk with a great personal interest in most of the issues we are called to address in the ALAC. But it still steams me when we are treated as unloved third cousins from the countryside, constantly under pressure to hold our place and entitlements.
From the instigation that was ALAC 2.0, Alan has worked tirelesdly to advancethe enduser sgenda. Since his first term as ALAC Chair, he has done yeoman work to hold the line on our common achievements and has worked doubly hard to advance the At-Large agenda. He should be reelected.
I urge the electors to vote and assert your confidence in Alan's leadership.
-Carlton
============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround =============================
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support.
It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN.
I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do.
I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas:
ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original “Interim ALAC” to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair’s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it “their” money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem.
Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years.
All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation.
I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year.
I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl.
Alan
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Alan, I support your nomination. Tijani Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit :
Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support.
It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN.
I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do.
I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas:
* ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. * Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. * ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original "Interim ALAC" to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair's involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. * The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it "their" money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem.
Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years.
All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation.
I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year.
I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at <mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl.
Alan
I support Alan's Candidature as well. Best Regards On 8/29/16, wafa@ati.tn <wafa@ati.tn> wrote:
Dear Alain,
I support your candidature.
Regards
Le 27 août 2016 3:26 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit :
Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support.
It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN.
I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do.
I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas:
ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original �Interim ALAC� to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair�s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it �their� money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem.
Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years.
All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation.
I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year.
I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl.
Alan
-- Barrack O. Otieno +254721325277 +254733206359 Skype: barrack.otieno PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
I eprsonallyhave already supported ALAN, but have not seen a “second” for his candidature. If it is needed, here is mine: I certainly second Leon proposal for ALAN to continue his mandate. Best to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "wafa@ati.tn" <wafa@ati.tn> Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 4:01 AM To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> Cc: 'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [ALAC] Acceptance of Chair Nomination Dear Alain, I support your candidature. Regards Le 27 août 2016 3:26 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> a écrit : Thank you for the nomination and thanks to all those who publicly or privately have sent messages of support. It is extremely important that end-users have a real and strong voice in ICANN. Users are the ultimate reason that the Internet exists. It is end users who patronize online commerce sites, read (and write) the near infinite number of blogs, cause YouTube videos to go viral, communicate with friends, relatives and colleagues with e-mail and social media, and sadly, respond to spam and phishing attacks. The needs of these users must be considered in the development of Internet policy. The ALAC and At-Large serve as the advocates of end users and represent their best interests within ICANN. I have been involved in user and usability issues for all of my career, and have now spent close to ten years working with At-Large. Working collaboratively with my ALAC and At-Large colleagues, we have transformed the ALAC and At-Large Community into a serious force within ICANN. However, there is more to do. I am currently completing my 2nd year as ALAC Chair. My focus over the last 22 months has included the following critical areas: * ALS Effectiveness: We have been very successful at increasing the number of ALSes. Over the last two years, although we are still actively recruiting ALSes, much of our focus has changed from just outreach to outreach and engagement, with the intent of increasing ALS effectiveness, both in telling their communities about ICANN and where applicable, having them contribute to our policy activities. Capacity building and briefings on subjects of current importance (such as the IANA transition) are important parts of this, as are the regular monthly distributions of understandable information (in multiple languages) that we are currently discussing. I have no doubt that the ongoing At-Large Review will play an important part in this. * Policy Development: We now have more ALAC and RALO members and leaders actively involved in ICANN policy development and related ALAC activities. This needs to continue to grow. There are steep learning curves but it is encouraging that the number of At-Large members on cross community and GNSO working groups is growing, and increasingly, people are not just listening but contributing. * ALAC Chair Viability: As the ALAC transitioned from the original �Interim ALAC� to the current model with RALOs, the Chair position became substantially more than a full-time job. That effectively means that the only person who can meet the demands is someone who is retired and/or willing to put most of the rest of their life on hold. This is not a sustainable model. We have made improvements over the last two years, but there is more to do in reducing the Chair�s involvement through process changes, transferring responsibility to ALT and ALAC Members and, as appropriate, to Staff. * The ALAC in ICANN: When I started in ICANN, the ALAC was to a large extent considered a joke (and not a good one) and a poor use of ICANN funds (or registry and registrar funds as they are ICANN main sources of income and those groups generally considered it �their� money instead of that of the registrants who actually provided it). Through the concerted efforts of past Chairs, others in the ALAC and At-Large and myself, that is no longer the case. If it was still a perception of some in the community, the recent CWG-Stewardship and CCWG-Accountability clearly showed that we were a force to be contended with. It will take constant work to ensure that we continue to live up to the reputation we now have as a critical and respected part of the ICANN ecosystem. Good progress has been made on these fronts, and in a range of other areas, but not nearly as much as I had envisioned when I became Chair. This is largely due to the (unexpected) overwhelming workload associated with the IANA transition and accountability efforts that has occupied both the ALAC and me over the past two years. All of these areas will require further efforts and if I am reappointed, they will be among my priorities. In addition, I am committed to working to ensure that ICANN understands the value of At-Large volunteers, arguably the only group within ICANN that has no self-interests (and along with it no external funding), and reduce the barriers to such continued participation. I hope that the ALAC will find that I have served it well over during my first term and allow me to continue as Chair for another year. I am available to discuss any of this further. You can contact me via e-mail at alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> or to chat on Skype at alangreenberg-mtl. Alan
participants (9)
-
Alan Greenberg -
Barrack Otieno -
Carlton Samuels -
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía -
Seun Ojedeji -
sylvia＠internautabrasil.org -
tijani.benjemaa＠topnet.tn -
Vanda Scartezini -
wafa＠ati.tn