+1 also Sent from Samsung Focus <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> </div><div>Date: 3/2/18 2:17 AM (GMT-04:00) </div><div>To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> </div><div>Cc: ALAC Working List <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> </div><div>Subject: Re: [ALAC] URGENT: ALAC endorsements for Study on Root Zone Label Generation Rules </div><div> </div>I agree with this approach as well Regards Sent from my mobile Kindly excuse brevity and typos On Mar 1, 2018 11:16 PM, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote: Although many people were silent during the discussion at Tuesday's ALAC meeting, the tone of those who spoke was that we should not be expected to endorse people who we do not know and who have no affiliation with us. Specifically, if the group needs experts, they should be able to name them. Period. I note that apparently, such a rule was not included in the specification of the group - https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2018-02-08-en. Unless I hear disagreement soon, I will reply saying that the ALAC is not willing to endorse people who we do not know and who have no affiliation with us, and suggest that the Board be approached asking for permission to name independent experts. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)