ICANN blog: Sharing a Plan for Public Comment Improvements
The 40 day minimum comment period and the standardised schedule for opening public comments are good improvements. Not so sure about the reply comment phase. Dev Anand "The immediate improvements to be implemented after the London meeting include: The reply comment phase of public comment forums will be eliminated. Data evaluation and community feedback confirm that this experiment inspired by the ATRT1 recommendations has not been effective. Staff will establish a standardized schedule for the opening of future public comment periods at regular intervals. We intend to open public comment periods on an established monthly schedule - likely two times a month (e.g., first Monday and third Monday of every month). It is hoped that this will enable the various ICANN communities and their members to better organize their work. Expectations will be established and enforced among ICANN staff to ensure prompt creation of post-public comment period summary reports. Compliance with these new processes will be rigorously managed and metrics recorded. A process for community complaints about summary report content and mechanisms for corrections will be instituted. ICANN will return to a minimum comment period format. For the next six months (after the new processes are implemented) the default minimum comment period will be 40 days." Read https://www.icann.org/news/blog/sharing-a-plan-for-public-comment-improvemen... for the full text.
Dear Dev, if they're following the ATRT2 recommendations, they're testing out different methods so we'll see how they work/don't work for the ALAC. It is for 6 months after all? Kind regards, Olivier On 13/06/2014 01:48, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
The 40 day minimum comment period and the standardised schedule for opening public comments are good improvements. Not so sure about the reply comment phase.
Dev Anand
"The immediate improvements to be implemented after the London meeting include:
The reply comment phase of public comment forums will be eliminated. Data evaluation and community feedback confirm that this experiment inspired by the ATRT1 recommendations has not been effective.
Staff will establish a standardized schedule for the opening of future public comment periods at regular intervals. We intend to open public comment periods on an established monthly schedule - likely two times a month (e.g., first Monday and third Monday of every month). It is hoped that this will enable the various ICANN communities and their members to better organize their work.
Expectations will be established and enforced among ICANN staff to ensure prompt creation of post-public comment period summary reports. Compliance with these new processes will be rigorously managed and metrics recorded.
A process for community complaints about summary report content and mechanisms for corrections will be instituted.
ICANN will return to a minimum comment period format. For the next six months (after the new processes are implemented) the default minimum comment period will be 40 days."
Read https://www.icann.org/news/blog/sharing-a-plan-for-public-comment-improvemen...
for the full text. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
IMHO, what is most important here is that analysis of comments received. That output would be a very important element to determine a definitive overall -meaning global - view of the subject matter. And the best opportunity to 'game' and/or channelize. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Dev,
if they're following the ATRT2 recommendations, they're testing out different methods so we'll see how they work/don't work for the ALAC. It is for 6 months after all? Kind regards,
Olivier
On 13/06/2014 01:48, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
The 40 day minimum comment period and the standardised schedule for opening public comments are good improvements. Not so sure about the reply comment phase.
Dev Anand
"The immediate improvements to be implemented after the London meeting include:
The reply comment phase of public comment forums will be eliminated. Data evaluation and community feedback confirm that this experiment inspired by the ATRT1 recommendations has not been effective.
Staff will establish a standardized schedule for the opening of future public comment periods at regular intervals. We intend to open public comment periods on an established monthly schedule - likely two times a month (e.g., first Monday and third Monday of every month). It is hoped that this will enable the various ICANN communities and their members to better organize their work.
Expectations will be established and enforced among ICANN staff to ensure prompt creation of post-public comment period summary reports. Compliance with these new processes will be rigorously managed and metrics recorded.
A process for community complaints about summary report content and mechanisms for corrections will be instituted.
ICANN will return to a minimum comment period format. For the next six months (after the new processes are implemented) the default minimum comment period will be 40 days."
Read
https://www.icann.org/news/blog/sharing-a-plan-for-public-comment-improvemen...
for the full text. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Just a suggestion but would it be worth it to have 10-15 minutes during one of the ALAC sessions to discuss? Have someone from ICANN staff brief us? Holly On 13 Jun 2014, at 8:15 pm, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Dev,
if they're following the ATRT2 recommendations, they're testing out different methods so we'll see how they work/don't work for the ALAC. It is for 6 months after all? Kind regards,
Olivier
On 13/06/2014 01:48, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
The 40 day minimum comment period and the standardised schedule for opening public comments are good improvements. Not so sure about the reply comment phase.
Dev Anand
"The immediate improvements to be implemented after the London meeting include:
The reply comment phase of public comment forums will be eliminated. Data evaluation and community feedback confirm that this experiment inspired by the ATRT1 recommendations has not been effective.
Staff will establish a standardized schedule for the opening of future public comment periods at regular intervals. We intend to open public comment periods on an established monthly schedule - likely two times a month (e.g., first Monday and third Monday of every month). It is hoped that this will enable the various ICANN communities and their members to better organize their work.
Expectations will be established and enforced among ICANN staff to ensure prompt creation of post-public comment period summary reports. Compliance with these new processes will be rigorously managed and metrics recorded.
A process for community complaints about summary report content and mechanisms for corrections will be instituted.
ICANN will return to a minimum comment period format. For the next six months (after the new processes are implemented) the default minimum comment period will be 40 days."
Read https://www.icann.org/news/blog/sharing-a-plan-for-public-comment-improvemen...
for the full text. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
Dear Holly, if you can find the time... https://community.icann.org/x/1YbhAg Kind regards, Olivier On 14/06/2014 06:22, Holly Raiche wrote:
Just a suggestion but would it be worth it to have 10-15 minutes during one of the ALAC sessions to discuss? Have someone from ICANN staff brief us?
Holly On 13 Jun 2014, at 8:15 pm, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com> wrote:
Dear Dev,
if they're following the ATRT2 recommendations, they're testing out different methods so we'll see how they work/don't work for the ALAC. It is for 6 months after all? Kind regards,
Olivier
On 13/06/2014 01:48, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote:
The 40 day minimum comment period and the standardised schedule for opening public comments are good improvements. Not so sure about the reply comment phase.
Dev Anand
"The immediate improvements to be implemented after the London meeting include:
The reply comment phase of public comment forums will be eliminated. Data evaluation and community feedback confirm that this experiment inspired by the ATRT1 recommendations has not been effective.
Staff will establish a standardized schedule for the opening of future public comment periods at regular intervals. We intend to open public comment periods on an established monthly schedule - likely two times a month (e.g., first Monday and third Monday of every month). It is hoped that this will enable the various ICANN communities and their members to better organize their work.
Expectations will be established and enforced among ICANN staff to ensure prompt creation of post-public comment period summary reports. Compliance with these new processes will be rigorously managed and metrics recorded.
A process for community complaints about summary report content and mechanisms for corrections will be instituted.
ICANN will return to a minimum comment period format. For the next six months (after the new processes are implemented) the default minimum comment period will be 40 days."
Read https://www.icann.org/news/blog/sharing-a-plan-for-public-comment-improvemen...
for the full text. _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALA...)
-- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
participants (4)
-
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Holly Raiche -
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond