Re: [ARIWG] At-Large Review: 6-monthly implementation updates
Dear Lars and all I think the June 30 and Dec 31 are very appropriate milestones and easy to remember when they comply to other formal reporting dates - ones I am associated with anyway. Our At-Large Review Implementation Interim Report is attached. I had meant to send it earlier but as we had not yet reached our own deadline date (23rd June 6 months to the day since we were given the go-ahead by the Board), I felt I was pretty safe. But with many thanks to Cheryl and Heidi in particular, as well as to the ARIWG team who have contributed, and continue to do so, to this work in progress on behalf of the At-Large community, we are very happy to present you with our Interim Report. Best regards Maureen On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:02 AM Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> wrote:
The Dec 31 deadline makes little difference to us as we are planned to report mid Dec anyway... and I see no issue with adjustment of a deadline for following mid year reports to June 30...
Obviously Maureen will also want y discuss with the ARIWG and get back to confirm, but my recommendation is to adjust our future report milestones accordingly.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 19:15 Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Cheryl, dear Maureen,
I understand that the ARIWG has just completed its first progress report. Congratulations on this milestone!
I wanted to use this achievement to enquire whether the ARIWG would be open to the idea of modifying the due dates for future progress reports, in line with the OEC’s desire to streamline the submission dates for all current and future organizational review progress reports. This would mean future deadlines of 31 December (i.e. either just before or just after the customary holiday break) and 30 June of each year for the ARI progress reports. The streamlining will allow the OEC to be more efficient in its oversight across the organizational review implementation processes, ensuring consistent reporting standards throughout the community.
I would be keen to hear your thoughts and whether this is something the ARIGW would be willing to accommodate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars
Dear Maureen, dear Cheryl, Thank you for submitting the Progress Report. We will forward it to the OEC immediately. And also many thanks for agreeing to the slight alteration to the reporting deadlines. Wishing you a productive ICANN65! Best wishes, Lars From: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> Date: Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 5:33 AM To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> Cc: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich@icann.org>, "Larisa B. Gurnick" <larisa.gurnick@icann.org>, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org>, Jennifer Bryce <jennifer.bryce@icann.org>, "ariwg@icann.org" <ariwg@icann.org>, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff@atlarge.icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: At-Large Review: 6-monthly implementation updates Dear Lars and all I think the June 30 and Dec 31 are very appropriate milestones and easy to remember when they comply to other formal reporting dates - ones I am associated with anyway. Our At-Large Review Implementation Interim Report is attached. I had meant to send it earlier but as we had not yet reached our own deadline date (23rd June 6 months to the day since we were given the go-ahead by the Board), I felt I was pretty safe. But with many thanks to Cheryl and Heidi in particular, as well as to the ARIWG team who have contributed, and continue to do so, to this work in progress on behalf of the At-Large community, we are very happy to present you with our Interim Report. Best regards Maureen On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:02 AM Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>> wrote: The Dec 31 deadline makes little difference to us as we are planned to report mid Dec anyway... and I see no issue with adjustment of a deadline for following mid year reports to June 30... Obviously Maureen will also want y discuss with the ARIWG and get back to confirm, but my recommendation is to adjust our future report milestones accordingly. On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 19:15 Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org<mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Cheryl, dear Maureen, I understand that the ARIWG has just completed its first progress report. Congratulations on this milestone! I wanted to use this achievement to enquire whether the ARIWG would be open to the idea of modifying the due dates for future progress reports, in line with the OEC’s desire to streamline the submission dates for all current and future organizational review progress reports. This would mean future deadlines of 31 December (i.e. either just before or just after the customary holiday break) and 30 June of each year for the ARI progress reports. The streamlining will allow the OEC to be more efficient in its oversight across the organizational review implementation processes, ensuring consistent reporting standards throughout the community. I would be keen to hear your thoughts and whether this is something the ARIGW would be willing to accommodate. Many thanks and best wishes, Lars
Dear Maureen and ARIWG members, Thanks for sharing the interim progress report. It's really a key milestones document from ARIWG team on behalf of At-large community. Looking forward to work with all of you in this regard. Best Regards, Jahangir Hossain Internet Society Bangladesh https://bd.linkedin.com/in/jrjahangir On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 10:33 AM Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Lars and all
I think the June 30 and Dec 31 are very appropriate milestones and easy to remember when they comply to other formal reporting dates - ones I am associated with anyway.
Our At-Large Review Implementation Interim Report is attached. I had meant to send it earlier but as we had not yet reached our own deadline date (23rd June 6 months to the day since we were given the go-ahead by the Board), I felt I was pretty safe.
But with many thanks to Cheryl and Heidi in particular, as well as to the ARIWG team who have contributed, and continue to do so, to this work in progress on behalf of the At-Large community, we are very happy to present you with our Interim Report.
Best regards Maureen
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:02 AM Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com> wrote:
The Dec 31 deadline makes little difference to us as we are planned to report mid Dec anyway... and I see no issue with adjustment of a deadline for following mid year reports to June 30...
Obviously Maureen will also want y discuss with the ARIWG and get back to confirm, but my recommendation is to adjust our future report milestones accordingly.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019, 19:15 Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Cheryl, dear Maureen,
I understand that the ARIWG has just completed its first progress report. Congratulations on this milestone!
I wanted to use this achievement to enquire whether the ARIWG would be open to the idea of modifying the due dates for future progress reports, in line with the OEC’s desire to streamline the submission dates for all current and future organizational review progress reports. This would mean future deadlines of 31 December (i.e. either just before or just after the customary holiday break) and 30 June of each year for the ARI progress reports. The streamlining will allow the OEC to be more efficient in its oversight across the organizational review implementation processes, ensuring consistent reporting standards throughout the community.
I would be keen to hear your thoughts and whether this is something the ARIGW would be willing to accommodate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Lars
_______________________________________________ ARIWG mailing list ARIWG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ariwg
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Jahangir Hossain -
Lars Hoffmann -
Maureen Hilyard