- At-Large - lists.icann.org

Re: [At-Large] [ALAC] [New gTLD RG] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 8, 2012

Oct. 8, 2012

At 07/10/2012 07:28 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >Dear Alan, > >My comments are in-line. > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >Sala, two comments. > >1. You use the term "sponsoring organizations" >(sometimes capitalized). The concept of a >"Sponsored" TLD has a very specific meaning in >ICANN, referring to some of the TLDs that were >delegated in the last decade. I do not believe >that the term is used in relation to the new gTLD program. > > >Sala: "1.16 A Registered Name is "sponsored" by >the registrar that placed the record associated >with that registration into the registry. >Sponsorship of a registration may be changed at >the express direction of the Registered Name >Holder or, in the event a registrar loses >accreditation, in accordance with then-current >ICANN specifications and policies." from the RAA >Template via: ><http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/raa-17may01-en.htm#1>http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/raa-17may01-en.htm#1 > Yes, the word is used in reference to a Registar who passes 2nd/3rd level registration to a Registry. But your context ("granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs") was to a Registry and a TLD. >2. In your last bullet, you make reference to TLD >which are not open to general registration of 2nd >level domains. The Internet is full of such TLDs, >including many ccTLDs with strong restrictions on >who can register 2nd (or even 3rd) level names, >and a slew of gTLDs with very restrictive >registration policies. > > >ICANN has generally accepted and advocates that >regulation of the ccTLD is not within its ambits >as this is administered under the various >countries where each ccTLD is subject to their >respective country's laws as far as regulation >is concerned. Countries differ in their >approaches. To some extent, there are jurists >who argue that the same can be said for the gTLD >market. On the other hand the material >distinction is on which occassions and which >instances ICANN has a say. It would appear that >ICANN does not have a say in ccTLD registration >policies compared to the gTLD policies where >ICANN does have a say. My comments in my last >email was restricted to what is within ICANN's >power to influence, that is their domain/jurisdiction. Exactly. And ICANN has regularly allowed gTLDs with restrictive registration policies. >I am not sure that the >situation is so dissimilar in that although these >TLDs do allow SOME registrations, they forbid >many others. If you are specifically worried >about such use of TLDs that are also generic words, that should be explicit. > >Alan > >I would be interested in seeing studies on the >impact of closed market registries and perceived impact. > >At 07/10/2012 06:26 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: > >The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service > >provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog > >names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy > >influences that largely impact on how Google operates. > > > >My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of > >Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, > >ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the > >community could point out to me a link so I can read. > > > > - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of > > extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD > > programme is involved; > > - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer > > groups that have already started lobbying > US Senate on the perceived harm; > > - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC > > Intervention; > > - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy > > decisions as far as anti trust, > competition is concerned, we have recently > > seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States > > District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International > > S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that > > anti-trust claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: > > > <http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf>http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf > ]. Not for profit organisations > > may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. > > - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but > > the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs > > without ensuring that these organisations > open up registrations of second > > level domain to others becomes reminiscent > of Incumbent Telecom operators > > pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial > > revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will > > [eventually] force someone either within > the US [Senate or DoC] where this > > could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to > > protect global public interest that it may > > be regulated. This same argument > > can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be > > internationalized if not regulated; > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss > <<mailto:seth.reiss@lex-ip.com>seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > > > > > Sala How so?**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > *From:* <mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org>newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org > > [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > > > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > > > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > > > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > > > At-Large Worldwide > > > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > > > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > > > s.a.r.l**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > > > settlement, see: > <http://www.publishers.org/press/85/>http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ > I thought that this > > > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Kind Regards,**** > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ > Crepin-Leblond <<mailto:ocl@gih.com>ocl(a)gih.com> > > > wrote:**** > > > > > > Dear Dev, > > > > > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > > > you recommend. > > > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > > > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > > > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > > > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; > <https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ>https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > > > Dashboard Workspace at > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG>https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG>https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > > > gTLD. > > > > > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > > > Monday August 6 2012 > (<https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg>https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) > decided > > > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > > > Application Comment Period. > > > > > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > > > > (<https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi>https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) > for discussion and possible > > > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > > <http://www.gih.com/ocl.html>http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ALAC mailing list > > > <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > > > At-Large Online: > <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > **** > > > > > > > > > > > > **** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > -- **** > > > > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > > > > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > > > > > Suva**** > > > > > > Fiji**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > > > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > > > > > Fiji Cell: <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>+679 998 2851**** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > **** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > ** ** > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala > >P.O. Box 17862 > >Suva > >Fiji > > > >Twitter: @SalanietaT > >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro > >Fiji Cell: <tel:%2B679%20998%202851>+679 998 2851 > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > ><mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: <http://atlarge.icann.org>http://atlarge.icann.org > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list ><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: ><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > >-- >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >P.O. Box 17862 >Suva >Fiji > >Twitter: @SalanietaT >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro >Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 > > >

2 1

Re: [At-Large] [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 7, 2012

Oct. 7, 2012

The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy influences that largely impact on how Google operates. My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the community could point out to me a link so I can read. - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD programme is involved; - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer groups that have already started lobbying US Senate on the perceived harm; - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC Intervention; - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy decisions as far as anti trust, competition is concerned, we have recently seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that “anti-trust” claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf ]. Not for profit organisations may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs without ensuring that these organisations open up registrations of second level domain to others becomes reminiscent of Incumbent Telecom operators pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will [eventually] force someone either within the US [Senate or DoC] where this could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to protect global public interest that it may be regulated. This same argument can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be internationalized if not regulated; On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > Sala – How so?**** > > ** ** > > *From:* newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > At-Large Worldwide > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > s.a.r.l**** > > ** ** > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > ** ** > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > settlement, see: http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ I thought that this > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > ** ** > > Kind Regards,**** > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > wrote:**** > > Dear Dev, > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > you recommend. > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > Best regards, > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > ALAC Chair > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > Dashboard Workspace at > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > gTLD. > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > Monday August 6 2012 (https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) decided > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > Application Comment Period. > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > (https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > -- > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > ALAC Working Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > **** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- **** > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > Suva**** > > Fiji**** > > ** ** > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851**** > > ** ** > > **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

2 2

Re: [At-Large] [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU s.a.r.l
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 7, 2012

Oct. 7, 2012

Sala, two comments. 1. You use the term "sponsoring organizations" (sometimes capitalized). The concept of a "Sponsored" TLD has a very specific meaning in ICANN, referring to some of the TLDs that were delegated in the last decade. I do not believe that the term is used in relation to the new gTLD program. 2. In your last bullet, you make reference to TLD which are not open to general registration of 2nd level domains. The Internet is full of such TLDs, including many ccTLDs with strong restrictions on who can register 2nd (or even 3rd) level names, and a slew of gTLDs with very restrictive registration policies. I am not sure that the situation is so dissimilar in that although these TLDs do allow SOME registrations, they forbid many others. If you are specifically worried about such use of TLDs that are also generic words, that should be explicit. Alan At 07/10/2012 06:26 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote: >The fact that Google is generally considered to be an intermediary service >provider, they need to demonstrate that in not allowing second level .blog >names to end users is not contrary to global public interest. Policy >influences that largely impact on how Google operates. > >My main concern would be whether we have access to a Study on the Impact of >Closed Generic Term Registries and the Impact on global public interest, >ICANN's core mission etc. If such a study was done, grateful if the >community could point out to me a link so I can read. > > - Closing off generic name spaces for exclusive use in the wake of > extremely poor global campaigns and awareness where ICANN or the gTLD > programme is involved; > - Challenges for end users and consumers noting that there are consumer > groups that have already started lobbying US Senate on the perceived harm; > - Controversies surrounding changing the rules during the game vrs GAC > Intervention; > - Regulatory trends within the US will have an impact on ICANN's policy > decisions as far as anti trust, competition is concerned, we have recently > seen this when the The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States > District Judge on 4 August 2012 *Manwin Licensing International > S.A.R.L., et al. v. ICM Registry, LLC, et al.*had ruled that > anti-trust claims could be filed over controversial .xxx [see: > http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf ]. Not for profit organisations > may be subject to the *Sherman Act*. > - On one hand, we are saying we advocate an open and free internet but > the mere granting Sponsoring organisations exclusive rights over gTLDs > without ensuring that these organisations open up registrations of second > level domain to others becomes reminiscent of Incumbent Telecom operators > pre-liberalisation of markets and whilst it will generate substantial > revenue for both these sponsoring organisations and ICANN, it will > [eventually] force someone either within the US [Senate or DoC] where this > could mean that since ICANN is incapable of self-regulatory aspects to > protect global public interest that it may > be regulated. This same argument > can be used by those Governments who already feel that ICANN should be > internationalized if not regulated; > > >On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Seth M Reiss <seth.reiss(a)lex-ip.com> wrote: > > > Sala How so?**** > > > > ** ** > > > > *From:* newgtldrg-bounces(a)icann.org > [mailto:newgtldrg-bounces@icann.org] *On > > Behalf Of *Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro > > *Sent:* Friday, October 05, 2012 2:02 PM > > *To:* Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > *Cc:* ALAC Working List; New gTLD Review Group; Susan Chalmers; apralo; > > At-Large Worldwide > > *Subject:* Re: [New gTLD RG] [ALAC] gTLD Review Group decisions regarding > > the comments on objection grounds on the ".book" application by Amazon EU > > s.a.r.l**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Dear Dev and All,**** > > > > ** ** > > > > The Association of American Publishers and Google entered into a > > settlement, see: http://www.publishers.org/press/85/ I thought that this > > would be of interest to the .book debate**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Kind Regards,**** > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> > > wrote:**** > > > > Dear Dev, > > > > thank you very much for your email explaining the course of action which > > you recommend. > > I am CC'ing the present email to the ALAC for its information. > > I also trust that Avri Doria, Chair of the At-Large New gTLD Working > > Group, will be picking up the ball from here. I look forward to her WG > > making recommendations as to the course of action they suggest. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > ALAC Chair > > > > On 08/08/2012 19:51, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > > > The gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG ; https://community.icann.org/x/u7-bAQ) > > > received a comment on community objection grounds by InternetNZ, an > > > ALS in APRALO, on the application by Amazon EU S.A.R.L for the applied > > > for gTLD string "book" on July 26 2012. > > > > > > InternetNZ's comment was posted to the At-Large new gTLD Applications > > > Dashboard Workspace at > > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > > > > Several comments from At-Large, including members of the gTLD RG were > > > received and posted on the wiki page at > > > https://community.icann.org/display/newgtldrg/.book+_OG > > > including a condensed version of InternetNZ's comment by gTLD RG > > > members Eduardo Diaz and Yrjo Lansipuro. > > > > > > The comments by InternetNZ and others raises concerns regarding the > > > availability of 2nd level domains under generic TLDs. Whether domains > > > under such proposed generic TLDs should be available or "open" to the > > > wider public or "closed" to the applicants applying for the proposed > > > gTLD. > > > > > > Because such concepts are outside the scope of the application for > > > ".book" by Amazon EU s.a.r.l, the gTLD RG on its conference call on > > > Monday August 6 2012 (https://community.icann.org/x/iAUeAg) decided > > > not to submit a comment on this application to the ALAC for possible > > > submission to ICANN's new gTLD comment forum before the close of the > > > Application Comment Period. > > > > > > However, given the concepts raised regarding the availability of 2nd > > > level domains under gTLDs has policy implications that impacts > > > individual Internet end users, the gTLD RG recommends that the issues > > > raised be referred to the At-Large new gTLD Working Group > > > (https://community.icann.org/x/8Yoi) for discussion and possible > > > policy recommendations. > > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > > Chair, gTLD Review Group > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD > > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > **** > > > > > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > -- **** > > > > Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala**** > > > > P.O. Box 17862**** > > > > Suva**** > > > > Fiji**** > > > > ** ** > > > > Twitter: @SalanietaT**** > > > > Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro**** > > > > Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851**** > > > > ** ** > > > > **** > > > > ** ** > > > > ** ** > > > > > >-- >Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala >P.O. Box 17862 >Suva >Fiji > >Twitter: @SalanietaT >Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro >Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851 >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

2 1

India Internet Governance Conference underway in New Delhi
by Joly MacFie Oct. 6, 2012

Oct. 6, 2012

The current session 'Global Internet Governance: Strengthening The Multistakeholder Process' might be of Interest. The webcast link is http://bit.ly/iigc2012 - the conference room. joly On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:39 AM, ISOC-NY announcements < announce(a)lists.isoc-ny.org> wrote: > http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=4291 > > The India Internet Governance Conference <http://www.iigc.in/> (IIGC) is > under way in New Delhi, from October 4-5 2012. It is presented and hosted > by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce & Industry (FICCI) with > whom the Internet Society recently signed a cooperation agreement<http://www.internetsociety.org/news/internet-society-signs-memorandum-under…>. > The IIGC agenda covers a wide range of Internet issues, including the > multi-stakeholder model for Internet governance, International > Telecommunication Regulations and Internet governance, national priorities > for broadband access, cyber security and privacy, Internet Protocol v6 > (IPv6), and the Internet’s role in social and economic development, in up > to 3 simultaneous sessions. There is a live webcast. Delhi is 9.5 hours > ahead of NYC. > > *What*: India Internet Governance Conference <http://www.iigc.in/> > *Where*: FICCI, Tansen Marg, New Delhi, India > *When*: October 4-5 2012 > *Program*: http://www.iigc.in/PRG.pdf > *Webcast*: http://bit.ly/iigc2012 > *Facebook*: https://www.facebook.com/iigc2012 > *Hashtag*: #iigc <https://twitter.com/i/#!/search/?q=%23iigc&src=hash> > > ____ Internet Society - NYC Metropolitan Area Chapter http://isoc-ny.org 'The Internet is for Everyone." ___________________________________________ Announce mailing list Announce(a)lists.isoc-ny.org http://lists.isoc-ny.org/listinfo.cgi/announce-isoc-ny.org -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -------------------------------------------------------------- -

4 5

PGIS/P3DM activities in Tobago #PGIS/P3DM #ICT #Climate Change
by Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro Oct. 6, 2012

Oct. 6, 2012

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Giacomo Rambaldi <rambaldi(a)cta.int> Date: Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:47 AM Subject: [civic] [ict4cc-caribbean] PGIS/P3DM activities in Tobago To: "Caribbean ICT stakeholders Virtual Community (CIVIC)" < civic(a)dgroups.org> There are quite interesting PGIS/P3DM activities going on in Tobago.**** Here are some blogposts:**** - Participatory 3D Modelling in Tobago - key venues<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/participatory-3d-modelling-in-t…> **** - Caribbean nationals eager to develop P3DM in their countries: "P3DM a unique, totally new experience"<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/caribbean-nationals-eager-to-de…> **** - Participatory 3D Modelling exercise kicks off with much gusto in Tobago<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/10/participatory-3d-modelling-exer…> **** - ICTs for Climate Change Adaptation: Introduction of innovative technologies in the Caribbean<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/icts-for-climate-change-adaptat…> **** - Tobagonians will build a participatory 3D model of Tobago to plan for impacts of climate change and extreme climatic events<http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/obagonians-to-build-model-of-to…> **** - Participatory 3D Modelling (P3DM): five years after receiving the World Summit Award <http://participatorygis.blogspot.nl/2012/09/participatory-3d-modelling-p3dm…> **** I will be there on 10-12 October. Anybody on this list is going to drop by?* *** ** ** Best regards**** ** ** Giacomo Rambaldi **** ** ** -- Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala P.O. Box 17862 Suva Fiji Twitter: @SalanietaT Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851

1 0

UPDATE: ELECTION SUMMARY for ALAC Officers to serve from 22 October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

Dear All, According to Rule 2.1 of the ALAC Internal Rules of Procedure https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/27854147/AL-2007-1-1-Rev11… the ALAC will elect a Chair, at least two (2) Vice-Chairs and a Rapporteur. Rule. 2.2 states that all officers are normally elected at an Annual General Meeting of ICANN. Rule 9.1 states that the election call will be sent by the current ALAC Chair. This stage having been undertaken, it is now time to discuss those nominations. The election schedule is as follows: *_Election Schedule_* * 17 September 2012 Election Call /(sent to lists.)/ * 1 October 2012 Deadline for Officer Nominations /(to be sent to lists.)/ * 3 October 2012 Chair to post to the public ALAC list an "election summary" message /(sent to lists.)/ * 4-11 October 2012 Nominations are discussed * 8 October 2012 Deadline for Nominees to Accept their Nomination /(sent to lists and or as notified and recorded on the relevant Election Pages of the At-Large Wiki.)/ * 14 October 2012 Start of AGM * 18 October 2012 Closure of AGM * 18 October 2012 Start of Election of ALAC Officers by 2013 ALAC immediately after the closure of the AGM (Should a ballot be required) * 22 October 2012 Election Results announced * 22 October 2012 New ALAC Officers take their seats The following nominations have been received: EURALO Olivier Crépin-Leblond Chair Nominated by: Evan Leibovitch Seconded by: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro, Carlton Samuels, Natalia Enciso, Eduardo Diaz, Rinalia Abdul Rahim, Tijani Ben Jemaa, Sergio Salinas Porto NARALO Evan Leibovitch Vice-Chair Nominated by: Carlton Samuels Seconded by: Eduardo Diaz, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa LACRALO Carlton Samuels Vice-Chair Nominated by: Evan Leibovitch Seconded by: Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa LACRALO Carlton Samuels Rapporteur Nominated by: Eduardo Diaz Seconded by: APRALO Rinalia Abdul Rahim Vice-Chair Nominated by: Eduardo Diaz Seconded by: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro APRALO Rinalia Abdul Rahim Regional Representative Nominated by: Evan Leibovitch Seconded by: Eduardo Diaz, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Tijani Ben Jemaa APRALO Rinalia Abdul Rahim Rapporteur Nominated by: Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro Seconded by: Natalia Enciso, Sergio Salinas Porto AFRALO Tijani Ben Jemaa Rapporteur Nominated by: Evan Leibovitch Seconded by: Carlton Samuels, Olivier Crépin-Leblond A 2012-2013 ALAC Officer Election wiki page <https://community.icann.org/x/pocoAg> has been created that includes the following: * The election schedule as above; * An election schedule with the Rules of Procedure explanations; * ALAC officer criteria; and * Nominations for ALAC officers. Warm regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair

1 2

Weekly posting summary for at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
by Thomas Narten Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

Total of 55 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 5 00:53:04 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes | Who --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 18.18% | 10 | 56.25% | 583414 | carlton.samuels at gmail.com 12.73% | 7 | 7.94% | 82345 | salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com 9.09% | 5 | 5.21% | 54043 | ocl at gih.com 7.27% | 4 | 5.29% | 54856 | alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca 5.45% | 3 | 3.65% | 37826 | langdonorr at gmail.com 5.45% | 3 | 2.49% | 25848 | eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com 3.64% | 2 | 2.83% | 29389 | rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com 3.64% | 2 | 1.95% | 20218 | vanda at uol.com.br 3.64% | 2 | 1.30% | 13508 | evan at telly.org 1.82% | 1 | 1.12% | 11668 | vivekvc2001 at yahoo.co.in 1.82% | 1 | 1.10% | 11399 | william.drake at uzh.ch 1.82% | 1 | 0.95% | 9810 | yaovito at yahoo.fr 1.82% | 1 | 0.90% | 9297 | roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.82% | 8506 | h.raiche at internode.on.net 1.82% | 1 | 0.82% | 8462 | rudi.vansnick at isoc.be 1.82% | 1 | 0.79% | 8163 | fsylla at gmail.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.76% | 7838 | narten at us.ibm.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.72% | 7431 | joly at punkcast.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.71% | 7409 | brainstreetceo at gmail.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.71% | 7325 | jeff.neuman at neustar.us 1.82% | 1 | 0.69% | 7124 | cdel at firsthand.net 1.82% | 1 | 0.64% | 6684 | admin at ttcsweb.org 1.82% | 1 | 0.60% | 6228 | hongxueipr at gmail.com 1.82% | 1 | 0.60% | 6213 | ajp at glocom.ac.jp 1.82% | 1 | 0.59% | 6142 | derek at aa419.org 1.82% | 1 | 0.59% | 6072 | karl at cavebear.com --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ 100.00% | 55 |100.00% | 1037218 | Total

1 0

Re: [At-Large] [ALAC] CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST for ALAC Liaisons to serve from October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

Thank you Rinalia and Sala. :-) Alan At 04/10/2012 10:00 PM, Rinalia Abdul Rahim wrote: >Great! I second this nomination for Alan Greenberg as well. :) > >On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Alan Greenberg ><<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> wrote: >Thank you Eduardo. I an willing to serve in this >capacity and I accept the nomination. > >Alan > >At 04/10/2012 09:19 PM, Eduardo Diaz wrote: > >I wish to nominate Cheryl Langdon-Orr to continue as the ALAC ccTLD > >Liaison and Alan Greenberg to continue as the ALAC Gnso Liaison. > > > >-ed > > > >On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Cheryl > >Langdon-Orr <<mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com>langdonorr(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > I currently serve, and have done since > October 2010 as the ALAC Liaison to > > > the ccNSO Council, and *if* a Member of the ALAC wished to nominate me > > > *and* I was privileged to be selected, Please note that I would be most > > > willing to serve in this capacity for a FINAL YEAR of appointment whilst > > > training up and handing over to other suitable person(s) to be considered > > > next year. So yes I would be also seeking > an 'apprentice or two' to work > > > with. > > > > > > > > > *Cheryl Langdon-Orr ... **(CLO)* > > > <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 October 2012 10:45, Olivier MJ > Crepin-Leblond <<mailto:ocl@gih.com>ocl(a)gih.com> wrote: > > > > > > > *Call for Expressions of Interest for ALAC Liaisons to serve from > > > > October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The ALAC Liaison positions, and those currently serving in the role > > > > (until the ICANN AGM in Toronto) are > listed below. The incumbent Liaisons > > > > > > > > are able to stand for reappointment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that only current ALAC members can nominate and select the > > > > Liaisons. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Nominations are now called for each of > the following Liaison positions:* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > · GNSO liaison -- Currently held by Alan Greenberg > > > > > <<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Alan+Greenberg+SOI>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Alan+Greenberg+SOI> > > > > > > > > · ccNSO -- Currently held by Cheryl Langdon-Orr > > > > > > > > · SSAC -- Currently held by Julie Hammer > > > > > <<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Julie+Hammer+SOI>https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Julie+Hammer+SOI> > > > > > > > > · IDN Policy -- Currently held by Edmon Chung > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/APRALO/Edmon+Chung+-+Bio+and+Statement+…>https://community.icann.org/display/APRALO/Edmon+Chung+-+Bio+and+Statement+… > > > > > > > > > > > > > · NCSG -- Currently held by Evan Leibovitch > > > > > <<https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Evan+Leibovitch+SOI>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Evan+Leibovitch+SOI> > > > > > > > > The DotMobi Liaison position is remaining vacant pending clarification > > > > from DotMobi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *2012-2103 ALAC Liaison Selection Schedule: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * 4 October 2012 - Call for Expressions of Interest (to be sent to > > > > lists.) > > > > * 10 October 2012 - Deadline for Liaison Nominations (to be sent to > > > > lists.) > > > > * 15 October 2012 - Chair to post to > the public ALAC list a "selection > > > > summary" message (sent to lists). > > > > * 15-18 October 2012 - Nominations are discussed. > > > > * 19 October 2012 - Deadline for Nominees to Accept their Nomination > > > > (sent to lists and or as notified and recorded on the relevant > > > > Election Pages of the At-Large Wiki.) > > > > * 22-26 October 2012 - Selection of ALAC Liaisons -- if elections are > > > > required, they will be held 22-26 October 2012. Where only one > > > > nomination is received for any Liaison position, the nominee will be > > > > confirmed in that role on 19 October 2012 > > > > * 26 October 2012 - Selection/Election Results announced and any > > > > unconfirmed Liaisons begin in their roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Relevant Rules from the ALAC Rules of Procedure: * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 4 - ELECTION OF LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.1 Liaisons to ICANN's Advisory Committees, Supporting Organizations > > > > and Constituencies can be established by approval of the Committee; in > > > > > > > > that case, they will follow the rules established for the appointment > > > > and functioning of the GNSO Liaison > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.2 **Refers to *The Board Liaison*, and > is therefore not relevant here, > > > > and will be redacted from the revised ALAC ROPs* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.3 The election can take place by electronic mail, online balloting, > > > > written balloting, or any other means deemed convenient and accurate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.4 All liaisons serve for a term of one year starting from the closure > > > > of an Annual General Meeting and ending at the closure of the following > > > > > > > > Annual General Meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.5 Liaisons shall be freely chosen by the ALAC, according to the > > > > following criteria: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.6 They shall normally be persons who are current or former members of > > > > the ALAC, or are anyway familiar with the activities and functioning of > > > > > > > > ICANN and of the ALAC; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.7 They shall accept to serve on behalf of the At-Large Community by > > > > acting for the good of the entire Committee, working to bridge > > > > > > > > differences and build consensus, but also recognizing difference and > > > > enabling different opinions to be shared; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.8 They shall accept, while acting in their capacity as an ALAC > > > > representative, to put the collective views of the ALAC, always, in > > > > front of their own. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 5 - QUALIFICATION CRITERIA FOR LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.1 There is no requirement for a Liaison > to be a member of the At-Large > > > > Advisory Committee;* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.2 A conflict of interest statement must be filed; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.3 A person may not serve two different liaison positions at the same > > > > time; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.4 All liaisons can be removed before the end of their term by a vote > > > > of recall according to rule 11; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.5 All liaisons have a duty of performing their roles with diligence > > > > and loyalty to the Committee, and are bound to meet the minimum > > > > > > > > participation requirements set forth in Rule 21. In case of failure to > > > > do so, the Chair shall call a vote of recall. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The mission and responsibilities of each Liaison of the ALAC are: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.6 To participate diligently in the > meetings and activities of the body > > > > he/she is liaison to; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.7 To communicate and advocate the positions of the ALAC to such body; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.8 To report to the ALAC the current and upcoming activities of the > > > > body he/she is liaison to, as far as this is possible under the timing > > > > > > > > and confidentiality constraints of such *body;* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.9 When this is possible under such constraints, ask to the ALAC for > > > > advance instructions on matters that are going to be discussed by such > > > > body. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 6 - PRIVILEGES OF LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6.1 All liaisons have the same rights of access to information, mailing > > > > lists and documents *as the ordinary ALAC members.* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *PLEASE NOTE:* With the exception of the > ALAC ByLaw-mandated liaisons to > > > > the GNSO and the ccNSO, there is no assured travel finding for ALAC > > > > Liaisons to attend > > > > > > > > ICANN Meetings unless they are serving ALAC members. Therefore, > > > > assurances that they can still perform their role will be required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *The 2012-2013 ALAC Liaison Election - > Schedule and Nominees Workspace:* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This workspace is available at > <https://community.icann.org/x/lZEoAg>https://community.icann.org/x/lZEoAg. > > > > > > > > It includes the following additional important information: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > · Qualification criteria for liaisons; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > · Privileges of liaisons; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > · Election procedures, including specific procedures for the > > > > ALAC liaison to the SSAC; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > · A table listing who has been nominated for the various liaison > > > > positions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > > > > > > ALAC Chair > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ALAC mailing list > > > > <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > > > > > At-Large Online: > <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > > > > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ALAC mailing list > > > <mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > > > At-Large Online: > <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >*NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or > >subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named > >addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, > >disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by > >mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. > >_______________________________________________ > >At-Large mailing list > ><mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > >At-Large Official Site: <http://atlarge.icann.org>http://atlarge.icann.org > > >_______________________________________________ >ALAC mailing list ><mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > >At-Large Online: <http://www.atlarge.icann.org>http://www.atlarge.icann.org >ALAC Working Wiki: ><https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL…>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… >

2 1

Re: [At-Large] [ALAC] CALL FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST for ALAC Liaisons to serve from October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

Thank you Eduardo. I an willing to serve in this capacity and I accept the nomination. Alan At 04/10/2012 09:19 PM, Eduardo Diaz wrote: >I wish to nominate Cheryl Langdon-Orr to continue as the ALAC ccTLD >Liaison and Alan Greenberg to continue as the ALAC Gnso Liaison. > >-ed > >On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Cheryl >Langdon-Orr <langdonorr(a)gmail.com>wrote: > > > I currently serve, and have done since October 2010 as the ALAC Liaison to > > the ccNSO Council, and *if* a Member of the ALAC wished to nominate me > > *and* I was privileged to be selected, Please note that I would be most > > willing to serve in this capacity for a FINAL YEAR of appointment whilst > > training up and handing over to other suitable person(s) to be considered > > next year. So yes I would be also seeking an 'apprentice or two' to work > > with. > > > > > > *Cheryl Langdon-Orr ... **(CLO)* > > http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr > > > > > > > > On 5 October 2012 10:45, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com> wrote: > > > > > *Call for Expressions of Interest for ALAC Liaisons to serve from > > > October 2012 to ICANN AGM 2013* > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > > > > > The ALAC Liaison positions, and those currently serving in the role > > > (until the ICANN AGM in Toronto) are listed below. The incumbent Liaisons > > > > > > are able to stand for reappointment. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that only current ALAC members can nominate and select the > > > Liaisons. > > > > > > > > > > > > *Nominations are now called for each of the following Liaison positions:* > > > > > > > > > > > > · GNSO liaison -- Currently held by Alan Greenberg > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Alan+Greenberg+SOI> > > > > > > · ccNSO -- Currently held by Cheryl Langdon-Orr > > > > > > · SSAC -- Currently held by Julie Hammer > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Julie+Hammer+SOI> > > > > > > · IDN Policy -- Currently held by Edmon Chung > > > < > > > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/APRALO/Edmon+Chung+-+Bio+and+Statement+… > > > > > > > > > > · NCSG -- Currently held by Evan Leibovitch > > > <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Evan+Leibovitch+SOI> > > > > > > The DotMobi Liaison position is remaining vacant pending clarification > > > from DotMobi. > > > > > > > > > > > > *2012-2103 ALAC Liaison Selection Schedule: * > > > > > > > > > > > > * 4 October 2012 - Call for Expressions of Interest (to be sent to > > > lists.) > > > * 10 October 2012 - Deadline for Liaison Nominations (to be sent to > > > lists.) > > > * 15 October 2012 - Chair to post to the public ALAC list a "selection > > > summary" message (sent to lists). > > > * 15-18 October 2012 - Nominations are discussed. > > > * 19 October 2012 - Deadline for Nominees to Accept their Nomination > > > (sent to lists and or as notified and recorded on the relevant > > > Election Pages of the At-Large Wiki.) > > > * 22-26 October 2012 - Selection of ALAC Liaisons -- if elections are > > > required, they will be held 22-26 October 2012. Where only one > > > nomination is received for any Liaison position, the nominee will be > > > confirmed in that role on 19 October 2012 > > > * 26 October 2012 - Selection/Election Results announced and any > > > unconfirmed Liaisons begin in their roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Relevant Rules from the ALAC Rules of Procedure: * > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 4 - ELECTION OF LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.1 Liaisons to ICANN's Advisory Committees, Supporting Organizations > > > and Constituencies can be established by approval of the Committee; in > > > > > > that case, they will follow the rules established for the appointment > > > and functioning of the GNSO Liaison > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.2 **Refers to *The Board Liaison*, and is therefore not relevant here, > > > and will be redacted from the revised ALAC ROPs* > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.3 The election can take place by electronic mail, online balloting, > > > written balloting, or any other means deemed convenient and accurate > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.4 All liaisons serve for a term of one year starting from the closure > > > of an Annual General Meeting and ending at the closure of the following > > > > > > Annual General Meeting. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.5 Liaisons shall be freely chosen by the ALAC, according to the > > > following criteria: > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.6 They shall normally be persons who are current or former members of > > > the ALAC, or are anyway familiar with the activities and functioning of > > > > > > ICANN and of the ALAC; > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.7 They shall accept to serve on behalf of the At-Large Community by > > > acting for the good of the entire Committee, working to bridge > > > > > > differences and build consensus, but also recognizing difference and > > > enabling different opinions to be shared; > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.8 They shall accept, while acting in their capacity as an ALAC > > > representative, to put the collective views of the ALAC, always, in > > > front of their own. > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 5 - QUALIFICATION CRITERIA FOR LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.1 There is no requirement for a Liaison to be a member of the At-Large > > > Advisory Committee;* > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.2 A conflict of interest statement must be filed; > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.3 A person may not serve two different liaison positions at the same > > > time; > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.4 All liaisons can be removed before the end of their term by a vote > > > of recall according to rule 11; > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.5 All liaisons have a duty of performing their roles with diligence > > > and loyalty to the Committee, and are bound to meet the minimum > > > > > > participation requirements set forth in Rule 21. In case of failure to > > > do so, the Chair shall call a vote of recall. > > > > > > > > > > > > The mission and responsibilities of each Liaison of the ALAC are: > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.6 To participate diligently in the meetings and activities of the body > > > he/she is liaison to; > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.7 To communicate and advocate the positions of the ALAC to such body; > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.8 To report to the ALAC the current and upcoming activities of the > > > body he/she is liaison to, as far as this is possible under the timing > > > > > > and confidentiality constraints of such *body;* > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.9 When this is possible under such constraints, ask to the ALAC for > > > advance instructions on matters that are going to be discussed by such > > > body. > > > > > > > > > > > > RULE 6 - PRIVILEGES OF LIAISONS > > > > > > > > > > > > 6.1 All liaisons have the same rights of access to information, mailing > > > lists and documents *as the ordinary ALAC members.* > > > > > > > > > > > > *PLEASE NOTE:* With the exception of the ALAC ByLaw-mandated liaisons to > > > the GNSO and the ccNSO, there is no assured travel finding for ALAC > > > Liaisons to attend > > > > > > ICANN Meetings unless they are serving ALAC members. Therefore, > > > assurances that they can still perform their role will be required. > > > > > > > > > > > > *The 2012-2013 ALAC Liaison Election - Schedule and Nominees Workspace:* > > > > > > > > > > > > This workspace is available at https://community.icann.org/x/lZEoAg. > > > > > > It includes the following additional important information: > > > > > > > > > > > > · Qualification criteria for liaisons; > > > > > > > > > > > > · Privileges of liaisons; > > > > > > > > > > > > · Election procedures, including specific procedures for the > > > ALAC liaison to the SSAC; > > > > > > > > > > > > · A table listing who has been nominated for the various liaison > > > positions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > > > > ALAC Chair > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ALAC mailing list > > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ALAC mailing list > > ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac > > > > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > ALAC Working Wiki: > > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… > > > > > >-- >*NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or >subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named >addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, >disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by >mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately. >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

3 2

Can anyone tell me what was the final tally on the ALAC Appointed 2013 Delegates to the NomCom vote for LACRALO?
by Eduardo Diaz Oct. 5, 2012

Oct. 5, 2012

Thanks. -ed -- *NOTICE:* This email may contain information which is confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately.

2 2