Here, have all the power, we want to give it to you.. sounds too good to be true. Propose an external whistleblower process, make them reject it or accept that first, see what motivations the NTIA and Board really have about the transition, that will show how much time really needs to be dedicated to either a true or phony delayed process, in my opinion. The way its being done is all the work first and then seeing if it was worth it to do the work at the very end of the process. Make them show their cards now would be my strategy. Its a stacked deck, and the government always is the dealer, but you can make them show their hand and work from there if you want to. Ron |
| Well said Evan. Many of us have been anything but aloof. Befuddled, frustrated, exhausted... We've been pushing for real changes and disclosures without much support. Icann is adept at denial and self-preservation. This has little to do with accountability and transparency but it works well for what has become an inside circle pushing money around the table. We're dealing with a new monolithic sovereign entity, a virtual royal nation. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> Sender: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:38:37 To: parminder<parminder@itforchange.net> Cc: ICANN At-Large list<at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] ICANN oversight _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org |