Hi all,
I'm surprised that nobody -- here or
in the mainstream media -- has connected the dots.
There is significant global chatter
about one high-profile target of recent American tariffs,
"Heard Island and McDonald Islands", inhabited only by
penguins. While the memes and jokes resulting from this
inclusion write themselves, one might ask: how did this
Australian territory get included? Likewise, how did the
tiny islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon off the coast of
Newfoundland, part of France and thus the EU, get their own
designation (and tariffs more than double those of the EU)?
Numerous non-sovereign territories were listed.
Why? Even though they are not
countries, all of these listings have their own country-code
top-level domains (ccTLDs in ICANN lingo). For Heard Island
and McDonald Islands it's .hm which is not even used by the
islands' administration (they use Antarctica .aq). I am not
aware of any .hm domains in use by penguins, but
any
person in the world can have one for a flat $35/year
-- not sure if these are resold by any ICANN registrars.
Likewise St. Pierre and Miquelon's TLD is .pm, logically
administered by AFNIC so it is a European domain even though
it's physically in North America. This is similar to French
Guiana (.gf) which is in South America, part of the EU, but
subject to a LOWER US tariff rate than the EU.
Perhaps it is the incorrect
characterization of these domains as "country codes" that
encouraged the US administration to just go down the list
and assign tariff rates to (nearly) everything using its
impeccably accurate trade-imbalance formula. I think the
term "4-D chess" has been used to describe the strategy.
It's certainly beyond me.
Still, I wonder how folks in
domain-name land feel about one of its primary resources
being used this way. Should the IANA database come with a
disclaimer that not all "country codes" are, indeed,
countries? Is it misnamed, and, in this instance, is it
being used in a way that will bring it disrepute?
I look forward to the ccNSO's
statement of grave concern in response to ALAC queries.