That would certainly be a better process...
RJGlass | America@Large ha scritto:
> I am not trying to stand in the way of progress, rather I am convinced
> that not much progress has been made in the way of making a reformed
> application process of new ALSs. In preparing for future issues such as
> this, I would suggest more time and energy be used for making a quality
> document and clear up issues related to these documents. Unfortunately
> there has been so much going on that some things fall through the
> cracks. I'm afraid that this document is one which has been neglected.
I think that the text of a document like that would better be drafted by
a smaller working group of volunteers (gathering all those who have
strong opinions on the matter) and only submitted to the ALAC for
approval once controversial points have been cleared and substantial
consensus has been built in advance.
--
vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
--------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org