Alan Greenberg ha scritto:
> This thread seems to have
been split into two, one on At-Large and one
> on NA-discuss. I posted
this comments on the NA-discuss list, but want
> to make it here too to
ensure that we do not go off on a tangent... My
> apologies to those on
both lists.
>
> To be clear, the NomCom review suggested that the
ICANN Bylaws be
> changed to allow the ALAC to name two voting Directors
to the ICANN
> Board of Directors (a subset of which the review sometimes
called the
> Policy Board).
Just for clarification - that
suggestion (as well as the one about
replacing the five Nomcom-appointed ALAC
members with members selected
in some other way internal to the constituency)
was usually received as
a very preliminary idea, since the composition of the
ICANN Board will
be the subject of the upcoming Board review, while that of
the ALAC will
be the subject of the ALAC review; while of course the Nomcom
is
interrelated with both, those suggestions were received by many as a
bit
outside of the reviewer's mandate.
This doesn't mean that it
cannot happen, but it is very hard to imagine
that that could happen before
at least a couple of years, if you
consider that the Board review hasn't even
started yet, and the ALAC
review is at a very preliminary stage, and whatever
conclusions they may
yield have then to be examined by the Board and the
community,
discussed, finalized, and possibly subject to a transition
period.
--
vb.
Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu
<--------
--------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/
<--------
_______________________________________________
ALAC
mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large
Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC
Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
***
Scanned