On Sat, 14 Jul 2018 at 03:51, Kan Kaili <kankaili@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi, Julf,

You have raised a very interesting question. However, according to the attached article of mine, the "public interest" is exactly the consumers/end-users' interest, which is to be represented by At-Large. That is, as long as the govermental regulator is fairly elected by the public.

Kaili

----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan Helsingius" <julf@julf.com>
To: "ICANN At-Large list" <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 3:21 PM
Subject: Re: [At-Large] [lac-discuss-en] Vistaprint is abandoning .vista

> On 14-07-18 08:23, Kan Kaili wrote:
>
>> ● Such a refocus demands redefining the global public interest as the
>> initiator and driver of
>> ICANN policy rather than its current status of reactive adviso
>
> But who defines "global public interest"? Unfortunately the standard
> answer tends to be "governments/UN/ITU".
>
> Julf
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org