On 26-10-19 16:41, Peters Omoragbon wrote:
> I felt there was no need for me to respond to Evan, s contribution
> because it made no value to the issue on hand.
Seems you actually are responding, but without actually
addressing his points.

> If half of 60 selected delegates are absent
> because of institutionalised selective racial bias coloured in
> administrative bottlenecks, of what impact would the program have? 

Evan pointed out that the cause might not be racial bias.

I think it would help to be fact-based instead of resorting to
pure rhetoric and accusations based on assumptions.

        Julf
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.