On 27/02/2008, Izumi AIZU <iza@anr.org> wrote:

I agree in principle - to hear from all sides, and then make a sound
judgement based on our mission - to reflect global individual users
voices on this issue and within ICANN's mandate.

If we are part of ICANN decision making process and are on the
Board of ICANN, yes, we are very much responsible for the decisions
it made, but if we are an advisory, that is, to some degree, different.
In any case, we should consider this case on our own merit, and
if we think ICANN has made a mistake, we should not hesitate to
say so with firm material. BUT if not, we should not just jump in.

izumi

2008/2/27, Franck Martin <franck.martin@gmail.com>:

> All before you go either way, you should get independent technical advice
> and legal advice.
>
> Then form your opinion. Get both side of the story and do not jump the gun.
>
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  Franck Martin
> franck.martin@gmail.com
> http://www.peachymango.org/
> "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
>  G. Bachelard

> _______________________________________________
>  ALAC mailing list
>  ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>  At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
>  ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
>

--

                        >> Izumi Aizu <<

           Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita
           Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo
                                  Japan
                                 * * * * *
           << Writing the Future of the History >>
                                www.anr.org