Hi all

A different type of email protocol is fine but ISOC connect is not a good platform. Many people dislike it because you cannot see easily what email address it is from and also cannot easily respond to that person. I and others have plenty of issues with connect

Best
Judith 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 19, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:

Makes sense so long as it has a mail delivery function. Maybe exploring the ISOC connect tool could help for a start. Perhaps something for the technology taskforce (TTF) to look into.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Feb 19, 2017 18:24, "gbruen@knujon.com" <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:
Roberto,

There is a much better way. Web technology has evolved considerably, It is entirely possible to have a single interface where all At-Large participants can review current issues and collaborate in queues and streams. Instead of cobbling together a bunch of disparate systems for placing and tracking At-Large work, can we put all the tools in one place like every other effective organization has done. We're not using anything even close to workflow, none of the At-Large "Stuff" is results or goal driven. Log into this for that, log into this other thing for something else. This is a case study in driving our work into the ground.

-Garth


On 2/19/17 11:35 AM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
To me, it works well - or at least better than some alternatives.
But maybe there other ways that I don't know.
Anyway, please do not unsubscribe me :)
R

Sent from my iPad

On 19 Feb 2017, at 17:13, "gbruen@knujon.com" <gbruen@knujon.com> wrote:

Seun, there are always too many emails, none channeled to specific interests or needs. This decades-old "system" of collaboration and information flow is one of the great failures of ICANN to engage with the community. Why would anyone want to stay engaged?



On 2/19/17 10:46 AM, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
Hello,

The URL to unsubscribe is in the footer:


On that note, I wonder why a few people are unsubscribing? Are the mails too much already ;-)

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Feb 19, 2017 16:38, "Alexander Forsyth" <aforsyth.pdp@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org


_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org


-- 
Garth Bruen
gbruen@knujon.com

617-947-3805
http://www.knujon.com
ICANN At-Large Advisory Council
Author: WHOIS Running the Internet
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118679555.html
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org


-- 
Garth Bruen
gbruen@knujon.com

617-947-3805
http://www.knujon.com
ICANN At-Large Advisory Council
Author: WHOIS Running the Internet
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118679555.html

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org