Dear Joanna,
Thank you for sharing this with us ;-). This seems like a very general letter with no real substantive content just repeating what the GAC (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/ismail-to-chalaby-24apr19-en.pdf)and NTIA (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/redl-to-chalaby-04apr19-en.pdf) already said. I even enjoyed the statement from the EC (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-epdp-recs-04mar19/attachments/20190417/6f0a65b2/CommentsontheTemporarySpecificationforgTLDRegistrationDataPolicyRecommendations-0001.pdf) more because the content of it was in a much more substantive manner.
By the way - if anybody is interested, I wrote my entire diploma thesis about this topic (The Future of WHOIS - An analysis of the Policy Development Process under the GDPR with a focus on the litigation ICANN v. EPAG): https://unipub.uni-graz.at/download/pdf/3703735
Have a nice day!
Best,
Matthias
_________________________
Ing. Mag. Matthias M. Hudobnik
Von: At-Large [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Joanna Kulesza
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 03. Juli 2019 13:19
An: at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Betreff: [At-Large] G7 GAC and WHOIS - protecting end users
Dear all,
thought this might be of interest to better understand and substantiate user interests in the WHOIS/GDPR/UAM debate:
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
--
Kind regards,
Joanna Kulesza
-------------------
Joanna Kulesza, PhD
University of Lodz, Poland
ALAC / EURALO / Capacity Building Working Group Co-Chair
TT: @KuleszaJ