I have seen your postings. I think these comments are referring to the number of ALSes participating in the discussion rather than suggesting that none at all have participated.

On 13 Sep 2007, at 21:09, Seth M. Reiss wrote:

Nick
 
Trouble is, even though Randy and I made the effort the review and give our sincere input respecting Vittorio's drafts, those commenting on the lack of ALS input seem to have missed our participation entirely!  I wonder if only we can see the messages we post???  A new technological innovation perhaps?
 
Seth
 
 


From: Nick Ashton-Hart [mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 8:57 PM
To: RJGlass | America@Large
Cc: Vittorio Bertola; seth.reiss@lex-ip.com; At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [At-Large] ALAC submission to the RAA consultation

All the regions are collaborating together on the RAA WG to put a statement together, which is what Vittorio is speaking of below.

On 12 Sep 2007, at 21:06, RJGlass | America@Large wrote:

Hi,

I thought the NARALO put something in or was working toward doing so.

I don't know if this is the same discussion, please clarify.

Thanks,
Randy


On 9/12/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu> wrote:
All,

I (and the working group) are still waiting to know who will take over
the responsibility of finalizing the ALAC submission to the consultation
on the revision of the RAA.

Pardon me if I insist, but it is very important that the ALAC submits
its contribution in the next few days (the formal deadline was September
10). With the collective input of the group, I already drafted a 7-page
document which is almost complete - there is the need for a few hours'
work of revision incorporating the last round of comments, and then for
formal approval by the ALAC with whatever procedure the ALAC wants to
apply (I had asked for information about the procedure weeks ago, but I
don't think I had any reply).

Given that the ALAC wants to mark a sharp change of direction, I do not
think that it would be useful for me to continue leading this effort -
it would not bring to anything that the ALAC can agree with.
Unfortunately, apart from a few replies by Jacqueline, no ALAC member is
participating to this working group or has submitted any comments on
this issue, so there is no natural candidate. Perhaps the new Board
liaison can spare a few hours of her time in the next 2-3 days to take
care of this?

Regards,
--
vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <--------
--------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org



--
-------------------------
AmericaAtLarge.org
RJPacific.com
DDMF.org
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org

--
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart
Director, At-Large
ICANN
Tel: +33 (450) 40 46 88
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +41 (22) 595 85 44
mobile: +41 (79) 595 54 68

email: nick.ashton-hart@icann.org
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart




--
Regards,
 
Nick Ashton-Hart
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +41 (22) 595 85 44
mobile: +41 (79) 595 54 68

email: nashton@consensus.pro
Win IM: ashtonhart@hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart@mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart