Excellent point Garth !!! The people is more than a simple registrant, live now in a society of knowledge, have relations in this environment, made a new economy there, and in a near future ( with a good job), could they (including not connected people, because in some moment could be connected) will fall in account that ICANN is a government of this on-line world. So, we must work for the people (everybody, as you said), regardeless the conection status. I liked so much your participation, because gave a another vision of that.

Carlos Dionisio Aguirre

abogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
*54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
www.sitioderecho.com.ar
www.densi.com.ar


> From: garth.graham@telus.net
> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:06:24 -0700
> To: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [At-Large] Who is At-Large, anyway?
>
> On 26-Jul-07, at 7:38 AM, John L wrote:
> > The other group believes that it's all the Internet users who are not
> > parts of other constituencies, all the people who have never
> > registered a
> > domain and never will, but use domains every day when they use the
> > Internet.
>
> On 26-Jul-07, at 8:19 AM, RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
> > I'm not sure if there ever will be a time when the 'Internet user
> > with an email address' will ever have a concern about ICANN.
> > However, the individual registrant is greatly effected by anything
> > that ICANN does or says.
>
>
> It never occurred to me that there was any other definition than
> individual Internet users (ordinary people getting on with daily life
> online), regardless of their "registration" status. ICANN is a
> manifestation of an essential institution in a knowledge society.
> Internet users should not be defined by their relationship to ICANN
> but rather by the open nature of the society they inhabit.
>
> In the long term, those users (or, to put it another way, everybody)
> will become more conscious of ICANN-like mechanisms because:
>
> 1). If we [win?] (we could lose!), the citizens of a knowledge
> society will become more generally aware that Internet Governance
> means governance of online relationships by the Internet (and, in
> particular, Internet Protocol) more than it means governance of the
> Internet.
>
> 2). Achieving that growing awareness will depend, in large part, on
> resolution of the fundamental issue of autonomy in the ownership of
> the online expression of the self. We need to advocate for an
> evolution of IP that encodes "user-centric digital
> identity" (although that's such an awful expression). Although they
> are entwined, the right and ability to define who I am is a much
> broader question that the "registration" that defines where I live.
>
> Garth Graham
> Telecommunities Canada
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org


Descubre Live.com - tu propia página de inicio, personalizada para ver rápidamente todo lo que te interesa en un mismo sitio. todo en el mismo sitio.