---

Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:27:46 -0500
From: DThompson@GOV.NU.CA
To: dannyyounger@yahoo.com; alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [At-Large] .berlin and ALAC

OK.  I know I'm new but:

 

WWHHHHYYYYYYY????

 

Why not?  Why is this regulation in place?  I *know* that I'm missing something here...

 

>sigh<

 

D

---

From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger
Sent: Tue 12/11/2007 4:43 PM
To: 'At-Large Worldwide'
Subject: [At-Large] .berlin and ALAC

Re:  - Evan (waiting for someone from Taiwan to apply
for .CHINA  ;-) )

>From the ccNSO LA Minutes:

24-04 IT WAS RESOLVED that the ccNSO Council
recommends that the ICANN Board apply the following
principles in the new gTLD process:

No name of a territory as listed in ISO 3166-1 or a
meaningful abbreviation of it, whether represented in
a non ASCII script or in any recognised language
represented in that script, shall be available as a
gTLD. This principle should be revisited once the IDN
ccPDP Recommendation, if any, is adopted by the Board.




      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org