So the vote results clearly indicates it did not reach the
quorum.

I read Jaqueline's email, and assume others, too.
So it is not wheter we read it or not, but her text is
also confusing - she moved, but without specifics.

She wrote "Nick - shall we set up a poll or
go via email to you?"

Then the ononle voting was setup, but at least some of us are
further confused by Aaln's withdrawal or the request etc.
Others may have felt the voting itself is not necesarry
given the situation - Alan withdrew the request.

You don't seem to take these other important elements into consideration
and trying to move us to only one direction. THat is why a number
of ALAC members feel you are trying too much. I hope you see yourself
in the bigger picture.

izumi


2007/9/10, Nick Ashton-Hart < nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>:
From a number of emails on this list it appears that Members may not have read the email below from Jacqueline. This is the reason why a vote as below was held. 

The result of the vote below is as follows, and may be independently verified at:  http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=QCaKS5KXqpkBg8buLjLm

Poll Results

Poll menu: ALAC Board Liaison Election
Report date: Sun 09 Sep 2007 18:33 UTC


Resuls of the 2007/2008 ALAC Board Liaison Election

As at: Fri 07 Sep 2007 23:59 UTC
Number of voters: 5
Ranked by votes  
Rank
Decision
Votes
%
1
The two ALAC Members who have not voted should be permitted to cast their vote
3
60.00
2
The existing election should stand as final
2
40.00




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam@jacquelinemorris.com>
Date: 5 September 2007 15:53:19 GMT+02:00
To: <sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr>, "'Izumi AIZU'" < iza@anr.org>, "'Nick Ashton-Hart'" <nick.ashton-hart@icann.org>
Cc: "'At-Large Worldwide'" <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: RE: [At-Large] Election of the ALAC Liaison to the ICANN Board ofDirectors - result ?

Hi 
We have 2 motions seconded  on the table now - 
1)  To call the vote as is leaving out the people who who weren't able to
vote  - but tried/wanted - to vote
2) To extend the voting for 2 days to allow the people who weren't able to
vote  - but tried/wanted - to vote

So I move for a vote now for either 1 or 2. Nick - shall we set up a poll or
go via email to you? I thought I had access to set up polls, but I seem not
to be able to right now.

Jacqueline

-----Original Message-----
From: Sébastien Bachollet [ mailto:sebastien.bachollet@isoc.fr] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 09:16
To: 'Izumi AIZU'; jam@jacquelinemorris.com
Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide'
Subject: RE: [At-Large] Election of the ALAC Liaison to the ICANN Board
ofDirectors - result ?

I support this motion seconded.
All the best

Sébastien Bachollet
Président

-----Message d'origine-----
Envoyé : mercredi 5 septembre 2007 04:32
Cc : At-Large Worldwide
Objet : Re: [At-Large] Election of the ALAC Liaison to the ICANN Board
ofDirectors - result ?

I second Jaqueline's proposal. Let' make a minimum
allowance for the two to vote, but not re-open the
entire vote.

izumi

2007/9/5, Jacqueline A. Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com>:
We won't know
But I think that they may want to vote, given that there was a mixup in
the
timelines. We should give them the opportunity, and one has already
indicated that they wanted to vote, but was confused given the RoP vote
timeline and tried to vote when it was somewhat cleared up but it was
already closed, so I would agree with the suggestion that we extend the
vote
for a couple more days to allow the last 2 to vote if they want. Nobody
else
will change their vote, but those 2 should not be disenfranchised by the
holiday/moving/miscommunication.
Jacqueline

-----Original Message-----
From: John L [ mailto:johnl@iecc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 14:10
To: At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Election of the ALAC Liaison to the ICANN Board of
Directors - result ?

I would propose that with 87% of the committee voting, that indeed we
have not only a quorum - but a super quorum at that. ...

If there's only two votes left, can they change the result?   If not,
there's no point to waiting.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list


At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007
09:31


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.3/986 - Release Date: 9/3/2007
09:31



_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list


At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org




--

--