Jacqueline,
 
This is the first "joint" meeting of the ALAC and Secretariats and so far the Secrtariats have been completely left out.  In fact, when we put something forward it is just dismissed (Summit).  If this session is just going to be the Secretariats being railroaded by ALAC then I want nothing to do with it.
 
Somehow this has gone from a joint meeting to a meeting discussing the meeting tomorrow.  Fine, but do try to include what the "other half" wants discussed, too, K?  Elsewise its a bit misleading, don't you think?  Yesterday it was discussed and agreed that we would be presenting on the Summit and now it seems to be tossed out of the window by one person.  I am very against this kind of un-transparent process.
 
Sorry to be negative but I was SO happy at the end of yesterday, thinking that maybe some of the BS was behind us and that maybe we could all be productive together and now I see it all starting again.  This is just getting depressing.
 
Darlene

From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jacqueline A. Morris
Sent: Mon 10/29/2007 5:30 PM
To: 'Bret Fausett'; 'At-Large Global List'
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge communitymeeting with ICANN Board

OK
Here's my take on the agenda now:
Introductions – Jacqueline 5 mins
 - Acknowledgement and introduction for outgoing and incoming ALAC members
 - New members introduction
ALAC in Transition- Veronica – Report on – One day  Workshop - 5 mins
Discussion with Board on the future of ALAC and At Large - 30 mins
Policy issues -
- gNSO improvement and gTLDs – Alan (5 min + discussion 5 min - total 10
min)
- IDNs - Hong, Bilal - 10 min (include IGF, work with GAC and ccNSO)
- IPV4 and IPV6 – Izumi, Didier - 10 min
- Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAAs), Registry Escrow  -Beau, danny -
10 min
- Bylaws change (brief mention and any questions from Board before they get
to it in their meeting) - Jacqueline ; Cheryl - 5 mins max
- Budget- Cheryl and Annette - 15 mins total

This takes us to about  100 min, leaving 20 min for flexibility - e.g. late
arrival of Board members(happens a lot as they have to do many meetings) as
well as some flexibility to increase discussion time on issues that may turn
out to need more time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [mailto:bfausett@internet.law.pro]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 14:19
To: At-Large Global List
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's AtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

I agree with this as well. A significant portion of the meeting should be
open for a more flexible discussion of the status and future of the ALAC.

      Bret

> agree with Siavash
> that we should include a visioning issue as well.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

   

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02



_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org