Dear Darlene,
I agree that
I would like to remind you
and the all community, that this was first discusses on the ALAC conf call the 12
June 2007.
See: https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?transcription_12_june_2007
Extract
“Sebastien:
I would like to make one suggestion, Sebastien
about the spending money from At-Large. We, it seems that each meeting the goal
is to have one or two RALO coming and the ALAC member coming, that’s by
ICANN. I would like to suggest that we study the possibility to have during one
meeting per year, or one meeting each one-and-a-half year, all the RALO coming
together at the same place. I think it could be a very good improvement to
share and to know each other and let the RALO know each other.
Nick:
I’d love to propose that guys. To be honest with you, I’d love to. Or,
rather, I’d love to support you proposing it.
Female:
Like a real General Assembly?
Nick:
Yeah, I would love it.
Alan:
Are you saying in addition to coming when people are in the region, or instead
of?
Nick:
I would like to see…
Alan:
No, I was asking the original proposer.
Sebastien:
It’s Sebastien. In addition, I think let’s imagine that as it will
be in
Male:
All the RALOs or all the ALSes?
Female:
All the ALSes.
Sebastien:
All the ALSes of all the RALOs.
Female:
That would be, at the moment, ninety something people.
Cheryl:
And who knows at what point that would level off.
…”
I still support the idea
and we need to discuss this issue.
There are different ideas
ones developed by our colleagues of NARalo and ones I developed.
We need to find together
the best way to succeed in pursuing that objective to have this
Please find the different
doc:
“The details that
have been done to date are on the ICANNWiki at http://www.icannwiki.org/index.php/At-Large_Global_Summit
and something resembling
a summit outline is at http://www.icannwiki.org/index.php/ICANN_Ensemble
…
-
Evan »
And attached
All the best
De :
alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] De
la part de Thompson, Darlene
Envoyé : lundi 29 octobre
2007 23:31
À : jam@jacquelinemorris.com;
Bret Fausett; At-Large Global List
Objet : Re: [At-Large]
<IMPORTANT> Draft Plan forTuesday'sAtLarge communitymeeting with ICANN
Board
Jacqueline,
This is the first "joint"
meeting of the ALAC and Secretariats and so far the Secrtariats have been
completely left out. In fact, when we put something forward it is just
dismissed (Summit). If this session is just going to be the Secretariats
being railroaded by ALAC then I want nothing to do with it.
Somehow this has gone from a joint
meeting to a meeting discussing the meeting tomorrow. Fine, but do try to
include what the "other half" wants discussed, too, K? Elsewise
its a bit misleading, don't you think? Yesterday it was discussed and
agreed that we would be presenting on the Summit and now it seems to be tossed
out of the window by one person. I am very against this kind of
un-transparent process.
Sorry to be negative but I was SO
happy at the end of yesterday, thinking that maybe some of the BS was behind us
and that maybe we could all be productive together and now I see it all
starting again. This is just getting depressing.
Darlene
From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
on behalf of
Sent: Mon 10/29/2007 5:30 PM
To: 'Bret Fausett'; 'At-Large
Global List'
Subject: Re: [At-Large]
<IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge communitymeeting with ICANN
Board
OK
Here's my take on the agenda now:
Introductions – Jacqueline 5 mins
- Acknowledgement and introduction for outgoing and incoming ALAC members
- New members introduction
ALAC in Transition- Veronica – Report on – One day Workshop -
5 mins
Discussion with Board on the future of ALAC and At Large - 30 mins
Policy issues -
- gNSO improvement and gTLDs – Alan (5 min + discussion 5 min - total 10
min)
- IDNs - Hong, Bilal - 10 min (include IGF, work with GAC and ccNSO)
- IPV4 and IPV6 – Izumi, Didier - 10 min
- Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAAs), Registry Escrow -Beau, danny
-
10 min
- Bylaws change (brief mention and any questions from Board before they get
to it in their meeting) - Jacqueline ; Cheryl - 5 mins max
- Budget- Cheryl and Annette - 15 mins total
This takes us to about 100 min, leaving 20 min for flexibility - e.g.
late
arrival of Board members(happens a lot as they have to do many meetings) as
well as some flexibility to increase discussion time on issues that may turn
out to need more time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [mailto:bfausett@internet.law.pro]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 14:19
To: At-Large Global List
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's AtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board
I agree with this as well. A significant portion of the meeting should be
open for a more flexible discussion of the status and future of the ALAC.
Bret
> agree with Siavash
> that we should include a visioning issue as well.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org