Well, fortunately we all are reasonable people and that would never happen.
Hey, lets face it, I have a pretty big mouth at times. There have been times when a person or two have e-mailed me privately to say I was stepping out of line or my reasoning was faulty because... No problem. Thank you and I will govern myself accordingly (and have done so).
People like the ones we are seeing now have been warned repeatedly and I cannot conceive of an instance where the chair would just pull the rug out from someone without any kind of explanation and warning. It wouldn't happen and if it did then I'm sure we would all hear about it in short order.
I support Danny, Michele, Evan, et al, in giving the Chair a WHOLE lot more latitutde to act definitely and quickly without so much red tape. The notice going out to the list is a good idea and then state what action is being taken and then take it. Done.
Darlene
At 17:50 11/03/2008, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight wrote:
Content-Language: en
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=_000_C3FC68CA2B183micheleblacknightie_; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-428E52CB
Agreed.
If there’s a disruptive person on a mailing list simply ban them. I don’t see why you have to make it into a bureaucratic mess
Because I think this mail of yours is disruptive and non-democratic.
Would you accept to be banned for six months without the possibility to object?
I guess not. So, this has to be organised. Drum justice is not good for mailing lists.
Cheers!
jfc