That assumes a change in current process, by which a supermajority of the GNSO (ie, the domain buying-selling cartel) can essentially compel the Board to follow its wishes regardless of public interest or composition of the Board. Under the current system, the audiences to be convinced by lobbyists (ie, the constituencies of the GNSO) is much smaller. Indeed the lobbyists are already deeply embedded on the inside.
It sounds like advocacy for a return to something resembling the pre-ALAC ICANN board election processes. Not optimal, though better than we have now, but it requires blowing up everything that happened in the IANA transition and the culture that led to it. Expecting that to happen without external forces intervening is living in more of a world of pink ponies and unicorns than I've ever conceived.