Didn’t the ALAC agree to this ages ago? And haven’t all the
policy issues been discussed on the public list?
If you’re talking about final wordsmithing on a document for 24-48
hours after a month in discussion on the public list, I don’t see that as
being a violation of transparency and openness. More a practical way to
finally get a document finished and approved by ALAC to send out in time!
Jacqueline
From:
alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Robert Guerra
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 15:17
To: At-Large Worldwide
Subject: [At-Large] Discussions should be transparent / Open ...
I've repeatedly been raising the issue - that in
fact the ALAC internal list should be for confidential matters, while all
discussions (especially policy) should take place on the more open and
transparent public at-large list.
Any support on this matter would be most welcome.
regards,
Robert
---
Robert Guerra <rguerra@privaterra.ca>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.15/1173 - Release Date: 12/5/2007
21:29