@Barry;

I think part of the answer is what @Zuck is doing: first having ALAC clearly understand what we are and what we are not. Clarity of mission and purpose. @Zuck’s boolean graphs are super sharp for that. Next step is wielding that clarity in ICANN policy fora & processes in meaningful ways. Achieving power through actual relevance, not just trying to feel relevant through formal power (like positions and:or an extra seat @ Board) - not that having an extra seat would be a bad thing!

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:11 PM <bzs@theworld.com> wrote:

Perhaps I'm being naive but what seems to me is missing in this
conversation is: By what process might this ship be righted?

Multiple choice is acceptable.

--
-Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.