What amazes me in all the responses I am getting is that no one is either saying that the problem I have posed does not exist or it is not important to resolve, nor providing any alternative ways to resolve it.

They are just arguing with parts of my proposal, which is fine, although I think, while no doubt this is a somewhat complex solution to a complex problem, no one has been able to show why it really cant work.

To remind; the problem I had posed was about the very likely wrongful US's jurisdictional imposition on ICANN's process and vis a vis the root server maintainer. I had given a concrete example; of a US court pushing the well-known over-zealous US intellectual property law and enforcement to take away the gTLD of an Indian generic drug manufacturer even when the latter has no direct business interests or activities in the US... What is your response to such a very likely occurrence?

Should we simply ignore it?

Or, do you not think it likely, in which case lets discuss that

.... You cannot simply not respond to this key global governance problem that stares us in the face... (Apart from it, is the less likely but still to be remained prepared for possibility of the The Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US playing hanky panky with the gTLD of a country

that the US gets into serious enmity with.... every country likes to remain prepared for such an eventuality. You cannot deny them that right. )...

No one seems to want to address these key global governance problems. Do they not exist? If they do, then what is your response to and preparedness for these?