On Aug 20, 2018, at 17:16, gtheo <gtheo@xs4all.nl> wrote:

Danko is correct, in my opinion, Eurid is now part of a political game between the UK and the EU.


Theo Geurts




Danko Jevtović schreef op 2018-08-20 01:53 PM:

I understand that it is not up to EURID, but to EC (European
Commission), that hold the contract with EURID to manage to TLDs.
The problem seems to be that possible solution (grandfathering clause)
cannot be discussed outside of the whole package of Brexit
negotiations, effectively blocking any reasonable progress.
Danko
FROM: At-Large <at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> ON BEHALF OF
Roberto Gaetano
SENT: Monday, August 20, 2018 1:09 PM
TO: bzs@theworld.com
CC: At Large <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
SUBJECT: Re: [At-Large] A brexit problem that I heard about
Hi Barry.
You might have a point in principle.
However the reality is that each TLD can decide its own rules, and
therefore whether to be strict in terms of requirements - like for
instance .bank - or loose - like for instance .com.
.eu has chosen the first approach, and has all right to do so. Whether
EURID is willing to make an exception for Brexit - based also on the
consideration that, as far as I know, they do not make continuous
checking about whether the resistant still complies with the
requirements - or not, I don’t know. Apparently not.
Cheers,
Roberto

On 17.08.2018, at 19:31, bzs@theworld.com wrote:
Ok I'll say it...
How many of these affected *.EU domains were actually entities with
some sort of EU charter or relationship as the TLD was approved for
in
2005?
I realize it's naive to point out that .NET was for networking
organizations and .ORG for not-for-profits etc. in a world where we
have .XYZ and .FAIL (must they really be FAILures?)
Ok that ship has sailed because no one wanted to enforce it as it
would interfere with maximazing domain sales in those TLDs.
But are we really supposed to get lathered up about those who now
got
burned flouting all that?
What promise do those affected actually expect to be upheld? Chapter
and verse not "well, we assumed..."?
And, no, marching out one or two bona-fide examples doesn't quite
rise
to a counter argument.
If there were only one or two or ten I'll guess they could be
handled
since they would have always had a legitimae reason to represent
themselves with a .EU domain which one would hope would allow them
some explicit accommodation.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com             |
http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org