On Sat, Jul 14, 2018, 12:52 PM Johan Helsingius <
julf@julf.com> wrote:
On 14-07-18 08:23, Kan Kaili wrote:
> ● Such a refocus demands redefining the global public interest as the
> initiator and driver of
> ICANN policy rather than its current status of reactive adviso
But who defines "global public interest"? Unfortunately the standard
answer tends to be "governments/UN/ITU".
No. In the multistakeholder process we definitely Global Public Interest.
Your question "who defines..." reverberates questions such as "who defines what is good", and "who defines what is harmful and what is not". These are good questions, but often used to divert the very suggestion of doing good. The complexities in defining a notion shouldn't deter us from chosing an appropriate path.
Sivasubramanian M