Uncle Sam may express its opinion within multistakeholder paradigm. And other Uncles too.

--andrei

ср, 31 окт. 2018 г. в 5:42, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com>:
Dear Vanda:
I agree with you. That is, once we accept that ICANN is a regulator! [I credit the writer for being consistent in recognition.]

Not our Uncle Sam though. He simply will not say it's so. In my corner of empire we describe this as wanting to eat your cake and cut your calories at the same time.

-Carlton

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, 1:52 pm Vanda Scartezini, <vanda@scartezini.org> wrote:
Dear Carlton , all
Though ICANN is a private organization and could do whatever it want , at the same time it has a peculiar position as a “ regulatory” entity and as such higher level employees has access to quite confidential aspects of concurrent business and once out of ICANN joining just one of these companies with the knowledge of all in the market is quite an unfair situation and on my opinion would demand some quarantine of at least6 months as is normally demanded for high level government employees  

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for typos 

On 29 Oct 2018, at 21:48, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround

=============================
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org


--
Andrey Kolesnikov