Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs and then decide to review it, before they even did any work?<br><br>I&#39;m certainly confused here.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/5/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Denise Michel</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:denise.michel@icann.org">denise.michel@icann.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Dear members of the At-Large community:<br><br>Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public<br>comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would<br>guide the independent review of ICANN&#39;s At-Large Advisory Committee and
<br>global At-Large structures and processes<br>&lt;<a href="http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm">http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm</a>&gt;. The public<br>comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007.&nbsp;&nbsp;Please send comments to:
<br>&lt;<a href="mailto:alac-review-tor@icann.org">alac-review-tor@icann.org</a>&gt;. View comments at:<br>&lt;<a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/">http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/</a>&gt;.
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<br>Franck Martin<br><a href="mailto:franck.martin@gmail.com">franck.martin@gmail.com</a><br>&quot;Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question&quot;
<br>G. Bachelard