Dear Carlton,
ICANN should be learning from past experience, and the long list of activities show a great potential for conflicts of interest.
If somebody still thinks that ICANN should go into subsequent procedures with a one size fits all framework, i can only wish good luck. The conflicts of interst may push ICANN towards implosion.
I pesonally think that a categories based differrentiated approach for subsequent rounds (.brand, .generics & . communities) would guarantee ICANN a longer shelf life........
El 2018-07-14 02:44, Carlton Samuels escribió:
It really isn't a personal opinion; the facts are undeniable by virtue of the admitted regulatory signs.It is in ICANN's power to gift a resource, set the requirements by which one can be gifted, set the rules for use of resource, charge and punish violations of the rules as appropriate and exact a fee for gifting that resource. Anywhere else in Christendom and the known sensate world, those activities are the very definition of a regulator.ICANN has managed to convince itself and would wish to make accommodating idiots of the rest of us because it is politically difficult to do otherwise. I get the politics of it. But to ask me to deny the evidence of my two lying eyes and what is plainly the case in reason and judgment is a bridge too far. The Christian bible has a line in it "in Christ all things are possible". I would add a caution to that declaration: Save and except to take me for an idiot.-Carlton
==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:13 PM Kan Kaili <kankaili@gmail.com> wrote:Indeed Goran has said "ICANN is not a regulator" many times. I have heard him saying that myself. However, this is something I disagree with him.
Again, in my personal opinion, as long as the positioning of ICANN stays blurry as it is now, the confusion will only accumulate until it creats a crisis.
Kaili
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan Helsingius" <julf@julf.com>
To: <at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [At-Large] [lac-discuss-en] Vistaprint is abandoning .vista
> On 12-07-18 19:56, Kan Kaili wrote:
>> In my opinion, ICANN should play the role of a regulator.
>
> Our esteemed CEO, Göran Marby, has a number of phrases he repeats
> fairly often. "ICANN is not a regulator" is one of them.
>
> Julf
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org