On Dec 8, 2007 9:13 PM, Hong Xue <
hongxueipr@gmail.com> wrote:
如果你没有记忆丧失的话，应当记得：你自己就参与了关于此文件形成过程中的多轮磋商和讨论。这些都记录在IDN-WG 邮件组中，关于行动计划、政策选择都清楚地记录在ALAC相关Wiki页面上。如此熟视无睹、矢口否认，无法侮辱所有参与者的智慧，只会令你自取其辱。
你使用母语所表现出的傲慢，更令所有传承了千年文明的所有知识分子哂笑。
On 12/7/07, Danny Younger <dannyyounger@yahoo.com> wrote:
Re: "We had so many rounds of public consultations
and
opened so many channels for the IDN users to
participate. I cannot accept that it is completed "in
a rush".
Yet when I look at the archive of the IDN WG I see no
group discussions. Nor do I see Terms of Reference, a
plan of action or policy choices enumerated that
reflect considerations given to an interim or to an
overall approach.
What I see is vacillating and contradictory
statements: one the one hand, the ALAC states
(AL/2007/R/3): "no priority rights for new domain
names shall derive from the possession of existing
domain name strings as such", yet on the other hand it
now seeks to give priority rights (the fast-track) for
new domain names that derive from the possession of
existing ccTLD domain name strings.
It seems as if the ALAC is merely jumping on the
latest bandwagon that comes across rather than taking
principled stands.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent:
http://www.icannalac.org