Another interesting issue is that I see likely to happen that we will have
IDN SLDs with one symbol (for instance, for chinese script - Hong, please
correct me if I am saying silly things). So to have the restriction for some
scripts but not for others might raise additional questions.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Peake [mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp ]
> Sent: 19 October 2007 07:22
> To: Roberto Gaetano
> Cc: alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Subject: Re: [At-Large] [AfrICANN-discuss] ICANN Establishes
> Forum onAllocation Methods for Single-letter and Single-digit
> Domain Names
>
> Is that a concern at the second level -- a.com, b.com, c.com?
>
> Adam
>
>
> >One of the arguments against the one-letter domains was related to
> >mistyping. Once upon a time, when domain names were "sparse" in
> >relation to all possible permutations of the letters of the
> alphabet,
> >the chance of hitting a wrong domain name by mistyping one character
> >was very low (this is less and less true today). The
> argumentation by
> >John Klensin was that if we allow one letter domain names,
> you are sure
> >to land on a different domain by mistyping one character
> (because it is
> >the only one!), and this is a stability concern.
> >
> >I report this only for the sake of historical completeness, without
> >judgement on the merit.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Roberto
> >
> >
> >
> >From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >[mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Bret Fausett
> >Sent: 18 October 2007 17:04
> >To: At-Large writ small
> >Subject: Re: [At-Large] [AfrICANN-discuss] ICANN Establishes Forum
> >onAllocation Methods for Single-letter and Single-digit Domain Names
> >
> >On Oct 18, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
> >
> >>Perhaps ICANN should auction off the rest of the ascii alphabet and
> >>
> >use the cash
> >
> >
> >For the sake of argument, on what right would ICANN claim
> that money as
> >its own? ICANN placed a restriction on single-letter TLDs
> once upon a
> >time on the theory that the letters might be needed at some
> future time
> >for expansion of the TLD space ( i.e., that we might have,
> amazon.a.com,
> >amazon.b.com, amazon.c.com, etc.). So if that need no longer exists,
> >and the restriction can be removed, why do the auction profits go to
> >ICANN and not the registry and registrar?
> >
> >-- Bret
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >ALAC mailing list
> >ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-
> lists.ican
> >n.org
> >
> >At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org ALAC Independent:
> > http://www.icannalac.org


_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org