To: Barry Shein


I fully support the idea of differentiate pricing for .brands!


I even support a separate window-process for applications, evaluations and delegation of .brands, contracted out to WIPO to deal with!!!!!! And ICANN should just get a cut of of that. It owuld allow us to focus on the free open internet and the public interest.

---
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
carlosraul@gutierrez.se
+506 8837 7176
Aparatado 1571-1000
COSTA RICA



El 2018-07-12 05:49, bzs@theworld.com escribió:


A major problem with nTLDs, including (and particularly) brand nTLDS,
is ICANN should have charged, and should going forward, millions for
them, not $185K+$25K/year.

And if any were deserving but not financially capable they could be
handled on a case by case basis. It's not like it's difficult to give
something away so let's not bog ourselves down in that.

I think $2.5M for a new gTLD and $5M for a brand TLD sounds pretty
reasonable, and $100K/$250K/year, maybe more.

To quote a recent note here it's not much for a Fortune 500 company.

-- 
        -Barry Shein

Software Tool & Die    | bzs@TheWorld.com             | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org