Good point, Danny,
 
In San Juan Elliott Noss (sp?) from TuCows made the point that this issue wasn't discussed at all by the Board as something that shouldn't be done.  So, it really is questionable that this was brought up for public debate, as it certainly should have been.
 
Darlene

From: alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Danny Younger
Sent: Sat 7/7/2007 1:48 PM
To: At-Large Worldwide; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: [At-Large] Budget provisions relating to Domain Tasting

Alan Greenberg posted the following comment on 27
June:

"The ALAC requests that ICANN consider charging
registrars part or all of the $0.22 fee for names
deleted during the AGP."

http://forum.icann.org/lists/budget-0708/msg00001.html

Sorry to say, that I cannot find the minutes of the
meeting in which this decision was agreed upon, nor
can I find a recording of the San Juan meeting
sessions. 

How did the ALAC arrive at this particular
recommendation without the benefit of any on-list
discussion whatsoever?  What input did the RALOs have
into the endorsement of this one specific
recommendation?  Why were other viable options not
endorsed?

Is this an authorized statement?  If so, why wasn't it
issued by the chair? 

Some answers would be appreciated.




____________________________________________________________________________________
We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org