I think this would be a good point of time to consider whether that representative needs to be an ALAC member at all. Seeing the traffic around forming a EURALO, you won't be on the committee any more soon, so my sense would be that it might be good to keep John L there, but that you should withdraw from your position, and be replaced by somebody else. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org> On 2007-03-25 16:09:04 +0100, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

From: Vittorio Bertola <vb@bertola.eu> To: Interim ALAC <alac@icann.org> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:09:04 +0100 Subject: [At-Large] Message from dot mobi List-Id: At-Large Worldwide Community <alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org.atlarge-lists.icann.org> X-Spam-Level: X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5

All,

as you know, we appoint two representatives to the dot mobi policy board - currently being I and John Levine. As John resigned from the ALAC, there was some discussion on whether the appointment needs to be revised; both dot mobi (upon verifying their Bylaws) and John agree that it would be possible and good if he continued to serve at least up to the end of his present term. So they asked me to transmit the attached message - basically, they are asking whether the ALAC has any objection to John continuing to serve even while not being an ALAC member any more. Does anyone have any objection?

Ciao, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------

_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

www.alac.icann.org www.icannalac.org