This was a first draft at the proposal - there are loads of people working in a committee to develop this proposal further, so your comments should be sent to them, so that they can be taken into consideration. To that end I've copied the ALAC list on this email. Jacqueline

-----Original Message----- From: Meryem Marzouki [mailto:marzouki@ras.eu.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 19:20 To: governance@lists.cpsr.org Subject: [governance] "Internet users" Summit

Le 10 déc. 07 à 09:32, Vittorio Bertola a écrit :

...

However, since the idea of a summit came out months ago, I have been repeating that the ICANN Board will never put money on this if a clear explanation of "how will this event make a difference" isn't provided. So (AFAIK, as I'm not inside the process any more) the organizers are now working on providing exactly that. In general, I think that the event could be very useful or very useless depending on how its agenda and purposes are set up. I expect that this will be presented to the broader community in the near future.

and

Le 10 déc. 07 à 09:02, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang a écrit :

...

Why not to start with 12 people in a working group to draft a strategy to find out what to do and how to intervene?

Do you both mean, say, something like this:

https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?motion_on_the_summit_proposal (motion sent to ALAC mailing list on Nov 1st, and - as far as I've understood - prepared by Sebastien Bachollet (Isoc-France)) ?

excerpts: ""ICANN Ensemble" A global summit of the ICANN At-Large community" - Estimated budget: 500,000 USD (350,000 euros)

i.e. 310 USD (200 euros) per hotel night and 112 USD (75 euros) per diem. Which is quite good in Paris (unless, of course, if you only drink champaign -- a lot of champaign, I mean)

- Vision "The Summit's intent to 3.1.Help the At-Large structures to better understand At-Large mandates, structures, processes. 3.2.Provide the tools needed by At-Large leadership to involve and engage their members. 3.3.Drive the development of timely policy study and recommendations reflecting the At-Large point of view on both global and regional levels. 3.4.Encourage the exchange of ideas, experiences and energy within ICANN's At-Large community."

- 4.Objectives

"4.1.An informed At-Large community that is better able to interact with other ICANN constituencies, supporting organisations and advisory committees. 4.2.An informed At-Large community that clearly understands the issues confronting ICANN and ICANN's roles and responsibilities therein. 4.3.Increased involvement by At-Large in ICANN policy debate. 4.4.An At-Large community that more clearly understands the global, rather than merely regional, point of view on ICANN-related issues. 4.5.A more engaged At-Large community that clearly understands the timing and framework of various issues currently confronting ICANN"

- 5.Deliverables

"5.1.Resolutions based on policy development. Any resolutions which are not agreed to at the Final Plenary or require more regional consultation should be accompanied by hard deadlines for passage. 5.2.Establishment of working groups related to specific policies with explicit goals and timetables for production of papers or resolutions. 5.3.ALS leadership who are fully aware of ICANN, its workings and its issues, who are ready and able to bring this information to their members. 5.4.Improved contacts and relationships between ICANN ALSs, within and between regions, and between At-Large and other ICANN constituencies. 5.5.Work on a “Individual Internet Users” declaration."

- 9.Notes

"[...] •Summit organizers -- with the assistance of ALAC, RALO chairs and ICANN staff -- will distribute in advance to ALSs information related to ICANN issues requiring attention. Each ALS is expected to discuss the policy issues sufficiently so that its delegates to the Summit can participate and vote on group resolutions. [...]

•All points of view will be welcomed; however, it is stressed that the Summit is intended to be a positive, progressive event and delegates are expected to participate in that spirit. Advocacy outside the scope of ICANN or intended as simply negative or obstructionist will not be welcomed."

(end of quotes)

In summary:

- "Internet users" == (current) "ICANN At-Large community". So, let's call this event by its name, i.e. the big "at-large structures" party, rather than "Internet users summit".

- This "summit" is intended for current At-large structures/ALSes capacity building (what the hell are they doing in the RALOs if not yet aware of ICANN's - and specially at-large - arcanes and what's at stake??)

- Whatever "declaration" will be written, it will be in the name of all "Individual Internet Users" on earth

My favorites are the "Notes". The two ones reproduced above mean:

- "Information related to ICANN issues requiring attention" will be elaborated and distributed by the "Summit" organizers: frame the debate as you want, and you'll get the outcome you want

- "All points of view will be welcomed"... But..."Advocacy outside the scope of ICANN or intended as simply negative or obstructionist will not be welcomed." :)))) From only some discussions on this list, we can imagine what this means.

Last but not least, given the budget per person, if you're an academic, I indeed recommend that you attend this "summit" as an ALS "leader" rather than visiting some colleagues in Paris in an academic stay framework or rather than coming as a UN consultant (per Suresh's indications).. Not to mention comparisons with usual low budget CS activities..

In any case, being myself based in Paris, I can guarantee that Paris is really great in June, and that these people will spend nice holidays here, in addition to reinforcing their positions as "leadership", "representing" Internet users, a.k.a citizens.

Have fun.

Meryem____________________________________________________________ You received this message as a subscriber on the list: governance@lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, send any message to: governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see: http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance