Re: [At-Large] Privacy, rights and fall meeting..
Well - I don't. Jacqueline. Of course, Jacque might, whoever that may be! Jeffrey A. Williams wrote:
Jacque and all,
If I understand you correctly you want non discrimination due to gender added as a "Core Value" re the Egypt fall meeting, and if not, than privacy should also not be added or is redundant. I do strongly agree as a "Core Value" non discrimination due to race, gender or condition of servitude should be such "Core Values" and so added accordingly and specifically.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> Sent: May 23, 2008 2:17 PM To: Robert Guerra <lists@privaterra.info> Cc: At-Large Worldwide <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [At-Large] Privacy, rights and fall meeting..
All I asked is WHY it's important to you and Danny. If you don't want to answer, fine. I NEVER suggested that we act to have gender be added - I simply noted that it wasn't there (as many other values aren't) so why do you guys want privacy added? And I have no idea what you are talking about re Egypt. Jacqueline
Robert Guerra wrote:
Jacqueline:
Have we had discussions about gender before in regards to icann policy? Is there a working group, policy group that is talking about gender? have any user groups and/or at-large groups raised the issue before? I don't think so. If you want to start that - new - discussion, please feel free to do so.
At-large groups have commented on the importance of privacy, and such - it is the reason I am supportive of Danny's proposal. I'm not saying one right is more important then the other - just that ALAC has raised the right of Privacy as a right before and we should include it as a core value.
Of course, having ICANN adopt and include more comprehensive core values that are support of human rights would be most welcome. As I've mentioned before, instead of including a laundry list of rights to include (and ones to exclude) at-large might prefer instead to support that ICANN adopt the UNDHR as a core value. Countries have done so at the UN - icann should as well.
btw. I still haven't gotten any comments from you or others on the ALAC in regards to my request to ICANN management to state if they will seek assurances from the Egyptian authorities that users from both Egypt and the region will be able to freely attend the meeting and have access to an unfiltered internet. In short I am most disappointed that ALAC and the at-large community seems mostly silent on the issue..
regards
Robert
On 23-May-08, at 4:08 PM, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
hi Robert Since you also indicate that you think privacy is a core value, I will ask you the question as well - what in your opinion makes privacy a core value? What are the reasons? I can see gender being a core value , it's pretty universal, I can see cultural diversity - pretty much universal as well - basically all the human rights ones. Privacy isn't a value enshrined in consitutions and cultures universally AFAIK. So it will help explain it if you guys could say what it is, and why it's a core value.
Jacqueline Robert Guerra wrote:
Before we start making a laundry list of values - let's first review existing statements and values mentioned both by users and At-large. Privacy is such a core value - and I support - Danny's proposal that privacy be added as a core value.
On the topic of additional values - instead of listing individual rights (such as privacy, gender, etc) we might want instead to focus on having ICANN adopt as a key value - a strong endorsement of the international norms such as the Vienna convention on human rights. The logic being, if it wants to act as an international body - they it should adopt and promote rights already agreed to by the international community.
http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/A.CONF.157.23.En
regards
Robert
On 23-May-08, at 3:26 PM, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
Hi Danny Not to say I agree or disagree, but I would like to ask - why privacy as a core value and not for example adding gender into core value #4 (functional, geographic, and cultural diversity ) Why is privacy a core value in your opinion? Jacqueline Danny Younger wrote:
> Dear members of the ALAC: > > As you may be aware, privacy is not an ICANN "Core > Value". The word "privacy" does not appear within the > bylaws. I am of the view that ICANN would be well > served by articulating that it respects privacy. > > If we ultimately seek to arrive at a consensus on the > fundamental issue of protection of personal privacy, > we need to have a starting point to stimulate > ICANN-wide discussion. Accordingly, I am asking you > to drive home this point by petitioning the ICANN > Board to amend its core values section in the bylaws > so that privacy may come to be acknowledged as a value > to be respected. > > I look forward to your comments. > > Danny Younger > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC mailing list > ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
participants (1)
-
Jacqueline A. Morris