Nomination: Alan Greenberg GNSO Liaison
I nominate Alan Greenberg for the position as GNSO Liaison. Best, Adam
At 24/10/2008 02:06 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
I nominate Alan Greenberg for the position as GNSO Liaison.
Best,
Adam
I accept this nomination. I have thought long and hard about whether I want to continue in this role in addition to the roles of Rapporteur for which I have also been nominated. I have decided that, should I be elected, both are appropriate. I understand that this will be a heavy load, but I am not a stranger to this. The reasons follow: - I think that I have been effective over the last two years. - Having started with the request for an issues report on expired domain names, I feel that I want to follow this through to the PDP stage. This will clearly be a major GNSO policy focus for me, and I do not think that adding the rest of the GNSO Liaison responsibilities to this will be unreasonable. - This will be year of very significant change for the GNSO, with the preparation and then actual transition to the new structure. I think that some measure of continuity will be very important to ensuring that our community is well served by that process. _ On the Rapporteur side, many of you may be tired of me repeatedly talking about the need to develop a better functioning and far more productive ALAC. There are several aspects to this. We need to address policy issues in a time manner, and to do this, we need to pick carefully what policy issues we address. To do this effectively, I think that we also need to streamline our administrative processes so that we do not have to continually focus on that part of our work. If the ALAC Review Mid-Point Consultation Report is any indication (and I think that it is a strong one), we are going to held accountable for our performance, and we do not have a lot of time to get ready. I believe that I can be helpful in both aspects. Alan
Excellent Alan. You are the best for the job! Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Alameda Santos 1470 #1407 Tel - +55113266.6253 Mob- +55118181.1464 vanda@uol.com.br Before print think about the Environment "The information contained in this message - and attached files - is restricted, and its confidentiality protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Please be advised that the improper use of the aforementioned information will create grounds for legal action." "As informações existentes nesta mensagem e nos arquivos anexados são para uso restrito, com sigilo protegido por lei. Caso não seja o destinatário, favor apagar esta mensagem e notificar o remetente. O uso impróprio das informações desta mensagem será tratado conforme a legislação em vigor." -----Mensagem original----- De: at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alan Greenberg Enviada em: sábado, 25 de outubro de 2008 19:13 Para: At-Large Worldwide Assunto: Re: [At-Large] Nomination: Alan Greenberg GNSO Liaison At 24/10/2008 02:06 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
I nominate Alan Greenberg for the position as GNSO Liaison.
Best,
Adam
I accept this nomination. I have thought long and hard about whether I want to continue in this role in addition to the roles of Rapporteur for which I have also been nominated. I have decided that, should I be elected, both are appropriate. I understand that this will be a heavy load, but I am not a stranger to this. The reasons follow: - I think that I have been effective over the last two years. - Having started with the request for an issues report on expired domain names, I feel that I want to follow this through to the PDP stage. This will clearly be a major GNSO policy focus for me, and I do not think that adding the rest of the GNSO Liaison responsibilities to this will be unreasonable. - This will be year of very significant change for the GNSO, with the preparation and then actual transition to the new structure. I think that some measure of continuity will be very important to ensuring that our community is well served by that process. _ On the Rapporteur side, many of you may be tired of me repeatedly talking about the need to develop a better functioning and far more productive ALAC. There are several aspects to this. We need to address policy issues in a time manner, and to do this, we need to pick carefully what policy issues we address. To do this effectively, I think that we also need to streamline our administrative processes so that we do not have to continually focus on that part of our work. If the ALAC Review Mid-Point Consultation Report is any indication (and I think that it is a strong one), we are going to held accountable for our performance, and we do not have a lot of time to get ready. I believe that I can be helpful in both aspects. Alan _______________________________________________ At-Large mailing list At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann... At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
participants (4)
-
Adam Peake -
Alan Greenberg -
Patrick Vande Walle -
Vanda Scartezini UOL